What if the greatest cure for our distracted, scroll-addicted minds was written over 3,000 years ago? Deuteronomy isn’t just repeating the Torah. It’s teaching us how to pay attention.
The fifth book of the Torah—Deuteronomy (Mishneh Torah)—is often dismissed as simply a review of what came before. But what if Moses’ final retelling wasn’t repetition at all, but one of the Torah’s deepest lessons about how human beings learn, remember, and grow?
In this episode of Madlik, Geoffrey Stern and Rabbi Adam Mintz explore how the Torah transforms review into a transforming discipline. From Ben Bag Bag’s famous teaching, “Turn it over and turn it over, for everything is in it,” to the Talmud’s praise of the student who reviews a lesson 101 times, Judaism offers a timeless antidote to our modern epidemic of distraction.
Along the way, we compare Moses’ retelling of the story of the spies with its original telling in Numbers, discovering how each retelling reveals new truths. We explore why detectives, trial lawyers, and cognitive scientists know that repetition uncovers what first impressions often miss. And we meet an unexpected companion on the journey—the Roman philosopher Seneca—whose warnings about information overload sound uncannily like a critique of today’s endless scrolling.
Drawing on Moses, the Rabbis, the Stoic philosopher Seneca, and contemporary cognitive science, this conversation uncovers timeless practices for overcoming distraction, deepening attention, strengthening memory, enriching relationships, and living a more meaningful and connected life. If our greatest challenge today is not a lack of information but an inability to focus on what truly matters, perhaps the Bible’s great book of reflection contains one of the newest and most necessary lessons.
Join us as we discover why the path to wisdom isn’t always found by chasing something new, but by returning to timeless ideas with fresh eyes—and renewed attention.
Key Takeaways
- Repetition Isn’t Redundancy—It’s Revelation – Deuteronomy doesn’t simply repeat the Torah; it reinterprets it. Moses teaches that every return to a familiar story can reveal a deeper truth. As Ben Bag Bag taught, “Turn it over and turn it over, for everything is in it.”
- Attention Is a Transforming Discipline – From the rabbis’ praise of reviewing a lesson 101 times to Seneca’s warning against skimming too many scrolls, wisdom grows not from consuming more information but from dwelling deeply with what truly matters. The antidote to distraction is not novelty—it’s sustained attention.
- Growth Comes from Returning – Whether studying Torah, reflecting on our own lives, or listening to another person’s story, every retelling changes us. The Torah reminds us that meaning isn’t found by constantly moving on, but by returning with fresh eyes, a deeper perspective, and an open heart.
Timestamps
[00:00] Why does Deuteronomy repeat the Torah?
[02:08] Chazarah: The forgotten Jewish art of repetition
[07:18] The spies story changes. Why does Moses retell it differently?
[11:06] Ben Bag Bag: “Turn it over and turn it over”
[13:36] Why reviewing something 101 times changes everything
[16:05] Deep learning vs information overload
[19:12] What police interrogations teach us about memory and truth
[23:10] Seneca’s ancient warning about distraction
[26:33] The secret to remembering what you read
[29:18] Why repetition keeps Judaism and wisdom alive
Links & Learnings
Sign up for free and get more from our weekly newsletter https://madlik.com/
Sefaria Source Sheet: https://voices.sefaria.org/sheets/738767?lang=bi
Transcript here: https://madlik.substack.com/
This week, we begin the fifth and final book of the Torah, Deuteronomy
At first glance, it feels strangely
3
00:00:13.160 –> 00:00:16.560
familiar. Haven’t we heard these stories before? The Exodus,
4
00:00:16.560 –> 00:00:20.040
Sinai, the spies, the wilderness, wanderings. It’s all
5
00:00:20.040 –> 00:00:23.760
repetition. But maybe repetition isn’t a flaw.
6
00:00:24.000 –> 00:00:27.750
Maybe it’s the point. Why does Moses spend his
7
00:00:27.750 –> 00:00:31.470
final weeks retelling a story everyone already knows? Why do
8
00:00:31.470 –> 00:00:34.590
the rabbis praise the student who reviews a lesson
9
00:00:34.590 –> 00:00:38.110
101 times? And why does Ben Bag
10
00:00:38.110 –> 00:00:41.430
Bag famously teach turn it over and turn it over,
11
00:00:41.750 –> 00:00:45.550
for everything is in it? Two thousand years ago, the
12
00:00:45.550 –> 00:00:48.950
Roman philosopher Seneca warned that reading too many
13
00:00:48.950 –> 00:00:52.630
scrolls too quickly would leave us distracted, restless, and
14
00:00:52.630 –> 00:00:56.230
unable to think deeply. Sound familiar? In an
15
00:00:56.230 –> 00:00:59.830
age of endless scrolling and shrinking attention spans,
16
00:00:59.990 –> 00:01:03.590
perhaps Deuteronomy has something surprising to teach
17
00:01:03.590 –> 00:01:07.190
us about the art of paying attention.
18
00:01:09.110 –> 00:01:12.630
Welcome to Madly. My name is Geoffrey Stern, and at Madlik, we light a
19
00:01:12.630 –> 00:01:16.470
spark or shed some light on a Jewish text or tradition. Along with
20
00:01:16.470 –> 00:01:20.230
Rabbi Adam Mintz, we host Madlik Disruptive Torah on your favorite
21
00:01:20.230 –> 00:01:23.440
podcast platform and now on YouTube and
22
00:01:23.440 –> 00:01:27.080
Substack. We also publish a source sheet on Sefaria,
23
00:01:27.080 –> 00:01:30.880
and a link is included in the show notes. This week’s Parasha is
24
00:01:30.880 –> 00:01:34.720
Devarim. Join us as we explore Deuteronomy and
25
00:01:34.720 –> 00:01:38.240
the Art of Attention and discover why Moses
26
00:01:38.320 –> 00:01:42.080
final retelling of the Torah may offer the oldest and
27
00:01:42.080 –> 00:01:45.440
perhaps the best antidote to our modern
28
00:01:45.520 –> 00:01:49.130
epidemic of distraction. Well,
29
00:01:49.130 –> 00:01:52.930
welcome back, Rabbi. We missed you last week, but it’s nice to be
30
00:01:52.930 –> 00:01:56.770
back. But you had a great conversation. It was truly
31
00:01:56.930 –> 00:02:00.370
illuminating. And one of the things that he said towards the end
32
00:02:00.610 –> 00:02:04.130
was, we’re finishing the Torah. And of course, he was right, because
33
00:02:04.210 –> 00:02:07.970
Numbers ends the Torah. And Mishneh Torah, the
34
00:02:07.970 –> 00:02:11.610
name for Deuteronomy, really means a copy
35
00:02:11.610 –> 00:02:14.290
of the Torah. And that’s where the Greek
36
00:02:14.370 –> 00:02:17.410
Deuteronomy comes from. Second law.
37
00:02:18.510 –> 00:02:22.230
So it really is a review, it’s a repetition. And
38
00:02:22.230 –> 00:02:25.710
that’s what we’re going to focus on today.
39
00:02:26.110 –> 00:02:29.950
In the yeshiva, we called it Chazorah. And
40
00:02:29.950 –> 00:02:33.670
in Yeshiva, Chazorah was important. And I think when it comes to
41
00:02:33.670 –> 00:02:36.910
the book of. The Book of Deuteronomy, that’s also important.
42
00:02:37.310 –> 00:02:40.750
I mean, to give you a sense of what Chazorah was. And I think I
43
00:02:40.750 –> 00:02:44.390
did come across it a little bit in college where you would have a
44
00:02:44.390 –> 00:02:47.950
professor give a class and then there was a TA and the teacher’s
45
00:02:47.950 –> 00:02:51.450
assistant would come out later and meet and smaller groups.
46
00:02:51.610 –> 00:02:55.130
But in the yeshiva, you would prepare for a
47
00:02:55.130 –> 00:02:58.730
shiur, a class bechavrusa. And then you would
48
00:02:58.730 –> 00:03:02.570
go over it, Bechavrusa. And at least my experience
49
00:03:02.810 –> 00:03:06.649
was, for instance, in Be’er Yaakov, where the
50
00:03:06.649 –> 00:03:09.850
Mashgiach gave most of his really exciting
51
00:03:09.930 –> 00:03:13.770
shmoozin on Shabbat, you couldn’t write it down. You couldn’t write it down.
52
00:03:14.810 –> 00:03:18.450
So you literally had to review it. And many of the
53
00:03:18.450 –> 00:03:22.240
great books that we have, for instance, on many of
54
00:03:22.310 –> 00:03:26.110
of the Hasidic great leaders, they never wrote it down. It’s their students who
55
00:03:26.110 –> 00:03:29.830
kind of wrote it down. So this is a big part of our tradition. Very
56
00:03:29.830 –> 00:03:33.510
important. Okay, let’s go for it. Okay, so it’s
57
00:03:33.510 –> 00:03:36.950
only in Deuteronomy 18, where it actually
58
00:03:37.190 –> 00:03:40.990
uses this word, Mishneh Torah. And there, of course, it
59
00:03:40.990 –> 00:03:43.990
is talking about the rules of the kings,
60
00:03:44.790 –> 00:03:48.150
and they shall have a copy of this teaching
61
00:03:48.150 –> 00:03:51.990
written for him, for the king. But again, this
62
00:03:51.990 –> 00:03:55.650
has been the traditional exploration, explanation of
63
00:03:55.650 –> 00:03:59.170
what Mishneh Torah is, this fifth book of
64
00:03:59.650 –> 00:04:03.370
the Torah. And of course, a lot of time is spent,
65
00:04:03.370 –> 00:04:07.010
Rabbi, on nitpicking and seeing how
66
00:04:07.090 –> 00:04:10.130
in the repetition, maybe the story changes,
67
00:04:10.370 –> 00:04:14.130
maybe how a different phrase is used, word is
68
00:04:14.130 –> 00:04:17.570
used. We’re going to explore just the story of the
69
00:04:17.570 –> 00:04:21.410
scouts in a few minutes. But of course, and I’m quoting
70
00:04:21.410 –> 00:04:25.090
from a Sefaria, a wonderful source that I discover,
71
00:04:26.110 –> 00:04:29.710
where he gives an introduction. And he says, the people, the scholars
72
00:04:30.430 –> 00:04:34.270
from the critical theory, obviously,
73
00:04:34.270 –> 00:04:37.230
who believe that Torah was written by many
74
00:04:37.790 –> 00:04:41.390
different authors, they will argue that that’s not a big
75
00:04:41.390 –> 00:04:44.790
surprise. Deuteronomy was edited by a different
76
00:04:44.790 –> 00:04:48.190
editor and different sources got inside.
77
00:04:49.470 –> 00:04:53.110
We find that even in the Mishnah, where
78
00:04:53.110 –> 00:04:56.670
we have the Mishnah and then we have a Beraita, and the Beraita
79
00:04:56.670 –> 00:05:00.410
maybe didn’t make the Mishna, but it’s a variation of it.
80
00:05:00.730 –> 00:05:04.330
It’s at the most basic level, this is varying
81
00:05:04.330 –> 00:05:08.170
texts. And that truly is something
82
00:05:08.650 –> 00:05:12.490
that is part of our tradition as well. We understood
83
00:05:12.490 –> 00:05:16.170
way back when there was no only recording. There were
84
00:05:16.170 –> 00:05:20.010
variations on everything. It’s really baked into our tradition.
85
00:05:20.650 –> 00:05:24.410
Amazing. Really good. So I do
86
00:05:24.410 –> 00:05:28.050
think, though, that even the classical commentators clearly, and
87
00:05:28.050 –> 00:05:31.670
I’ve always argued this, nothing that modern scholarship
88
00:05:31.670 –> 00:05:35.470
has brought up by way of a question or a problem that the
89
00:05:35.470 –> 00:05:39.310
classical commentaries didn’t already identify. And so,
90
00:05:39.310 –> 00:05:43.030
for instance, they will ask, so why were
91
00:05:43.030 –> 00:05:46.590
they repeated? What laws were repeated? So by way of
92
00:05:46.590 –> 00:05:49.750
example, Ramban Nachmanides says
93
00:05:50.310 –> 00:05:53.950
this book is known to constitute a review of the
94
00:05:53.950 –> 00:05:57.550
Torah. He uses that same
95
00:05:57.550 –> 00:06:01.110
word, hasefer hazeh yadushu, Mishneh Torah,
96
00:06:02.370 –> 00:06:05.810
in which Moses, our teacher, explains to the generation
97
00:06:05.810 –> 00:06:09.490
entering the land most of the commandments of the
98
00:06:09.490 –> 00:06:13.210
Torah that pertain to Israelites. And he distinguishes that
99
00:06:13.210 –> 00:06:17.050
from the priests. The priests. Nachmanides, for
100
00:06:17.050 –> 00:06:20.890
some reason, says, they don’t need that much Chazorah. They got it the first
101
00:06:20.890 –> 00:06:24.530
time. But the rest of us, Pashut Yisraelim, we
102
00:06:24.530 –> 00:06:28.130
need to be repeatedly admonished.
103
00:06:29.010 –> 00:06:32.770
And he uses this word, yahzir otam,
104
00:06:33.090 –> 00:06:36.430
this word from Chazarah. We have to be reminded.
105
00:06:37.070 –> 00:06:40.590
Sometimes you have to repeat the things. Multiple warnings,
106
00:06:40.910 –> 00:06:43.630
so forth and so on. So again, Nachmanides
107
00:06:43.870 –> 00:06:47.550
recognizes what is going on. And his take is,
108
00:06:47.710 –> 00:06:51.350
this is like Cliff Notes. Before you go into
109
00:06:51.350 –> 00:06:55.190
the land, you know your mom told you everything. Then as you’re at the
110
00:06:55.190 –> 00:06:58.750
door about to go, she gives you the short version. Don’t forget this,
111
00:06:58.750 –> 00:07:02.450
don’t forget that. Interesting. Well, I
112
00:07:02.450 –> 00:07:06.290
mean, interesting and logical. I mean, it makes sense that that’s what
113
00:07:06.290 –> 00:07:09.650
they need. Especially. You see, repetition is important
114
00:07:10.050 –> 00:07:13.850
because Moshe is going to die. He’s not going to
115
00:07:13.850 –> 00:07:17.330
be there. And they’re on the banks of Moab, and they’re moving.
116
00:07:19.090 –> 00:07:22.690
It’s part of the transmission process. It’s part of creating
117
00:07:22.690 –> 00:07:26.130
something that lasts beyond you. I love that. So
118
00:07:27.010 –> 00:07:30.850
we’re going to take one example, but there will be many examples in the
119
00:07:30.850 –> 00:07:34.630
Book of Devorim where there are variations. So we’re
120
00:07:34.630 –> 00:07:38.350
going to talk about the seminal moment of sending
121
00:07:38.350 –> 00:07:42.190
the scouts. In Deuteronomy 1:22, part of our
122
00:07:42.190 –> 00:07:45.950
parasha, it says, then all of you came to me,
123
00:07:45.950 –> 00:07:49.710
says Moses, and said, let us send agents
124
00:07:49.710 –> 00:07:53.390
ahead to reconnoiter the land for us and bring back word.
125
00:07:53.710 –> 00:07:57.430
In 23, he says, I approved of the plan, and So
126
00:07:57.430 –> 00:08:01.110
I selected 12 of you, one representative from
127
00:08:01.110 –> 00:08:04.810
each tribe. So first of all, it just us. Right from the beginning,
128
00:08:04.970 –> 00:08:08.410
it tells us what we already know, which is the whole Book of Devorim is
129
00:08:08.410 –> 00:08:12.250
written in the first person. It’s Moses speaking. This is novel. This is
130
00:08:12.250 –> 00:08:16.050
not something that we’ve had. But more to that, you could say
131
00:08:16.050 –> 00:08:19.849
that Moses is looking at it from his perspective, right? Means he changes
132
00:08:19.849 –> 00:08:23.370
the story and gives it from the way he remembers it,
133
00:08:23.690 –> 00:08:27.130
or this is the way it was. And the other version is a different
134
00:08:27.130 –> 00:08:30.490
variation. That’s correct. It’s not. In numbers 13,
135
00:08:30.970 –> 00:08:34.740
this is the. The fourth book of the Torah, it says, God
136
00:08:34.900 –> 00:08:38.700
spoke to Moses, saying, sent agents to scout
137
00:08:38.700 –> 00:08:42.420
the land of Canaan, which I am giving to the Israelite
138
00:08:42.420 –> 00:08:46.180
people and someone of each tribe. In verse 3.
139
00:08:46.180 –> 00:08:49.900
So Moses, by God’s command sent them out from
140
00:08:49.900 –> 00:08:53.380
the wilderness of Paran. Rabbi, this is not a
141
00:08:53.540 –> 00:08:57.100
slight of hand. It’s clear in the Devorim text.
142
00:08:57.100 –> 00:09:00.660
It’s I, I, I. Moses is the one who’s taking
143
00:09:01.060 –> 00:09:04.160
responsibility, authority approach
144
00:09:04.400 –> 00:09:08.120
Moses. And in Numbers, God
145
00:09:08.120 –> 00:09:11.600
is the one who commands Moses to send the spies. The
146
00:09:11.600 –> 00:09:15.440
whole story is different. So just to give you an example
147
00:09:15.440 –> 00:09:19.280
of how these variations stimulate thought, I’m
148
00:09:19.280 –> 00:09:23.000
going to quote Rashi, not because I think he’s convincing, but because
149
00:09:23.000 –> 00:09:25.920
again, he shows you the type of,
150
00:09:26.720 –> 00:09:30.520
I think, gymnastics that have to be done if
151
00:09:30.520 –> 00:09:33.920
you want to reconcile the two texts.
152
00:09:34.160 –> 00:09:37.780
So Rashi in numbers says, according to your
153
00:09:37.780 –> 00:09:41.500
own judgment, I do not command
154
00:09:41.500 –> 00:09:45.180
you, but if you wish to do so, send them. So
155
00:09:45.500 –> 00:09:49.260
he’s caging here. He’s saying God didn’t tell Moses to do
156
00:09:49.260 –> 00:09:53.020
it. He simply gave Moses permission to do it.
157
00:09:53.020 –> 00:09:56.780
And that, of course, reconciles it with our verse
158
00:09:56.860 –> 00:10:00.300
in Deuteronomy. But I would argue
159
00:10:01.180 –> 00:10:04.780
that in fact, what we are seeing in front of us is two
160
00:10:04.780 –> 00:10:08.360
variations. And those variations elicit different
161
00:10:08.360 –> 00:10:12.200
approaches. And maybe you can say elu v’elu, that this
162
00:10:12.200 –> 00:10:15.800
one and this one, they’re both, both true from a certain perspective.
163
00:10:16.200 –> 00:10:20.040
Good. Okay. That’s an interesting approach, that they’re
164
00:10:20.040 –> 00:10:23.880
both true. It just depends how you look at it.
165
00:10:23.960 –> 00:10:27.560
They, you know, now it’s hard because God commands Moshe to send the
166
00:10:27.560 –> 00:10:31.400
spies and the people approach Moshe, you need to tell a different
167
00:10:31.640 –> 00:10:35.160
story. You need to say the people initiated it.
168
00:10:35.670 –> 00:10:39.430
And then because the people initiated it, God commanded
169
00:10:39.430 –> 00:10:43.270
Moses to send the spies. That’s a twist. And again,
170
00:10:43.350 –> 00:10:47.030
I’m sure if this was the subject matter of today’s
171
00:10:47.030 –> 00:10:50.350
discussion, we would find 5, 10, 15 other
172
00:10:50.350 –> 00:10:53.470
variations on this which were trying to
173
00:10:53.470 –> 00:10:57.230
reconcile. And maybe they would say, like me, that they’re different, but
174
00:10:57.230 –> 00:11:00.870
they’re both true. The point is that reading
175
00:11:00.870 –> 00:11:04.550
a story, or I would say telling a story at
176
00:11:04.550 –> 00:11:08.330
least twice, you’re going to get some variation. And
177
00:11:08.330 –> 00:11:12.090
that, I think, is the point. And that, I
178
00:11:12.090 –> 00:11:15.850
think, has gotten our attention. And today we’re talking about how
179
00:11:15.850 –> 00:11:19.610
do you keep attention and how. What is the
180
00:11:19.610 –> 00:11:23.210
best defense against attention disorder where you
181
00:11:23.210 –> 00:11:27.010
stop being attentive and you stop growing with the texts.
182
00:11:27.570 –> 00:11:31.210
So we’re going to go to the Mishnah in Avot, and
183
00:11:31.210 –> 00:11:34.610
I’ve quoted this before, it says, ben Bog
184
00:11:34.610 –> 00:11:38.290
Bog said, I’ll get to his name in a second, turn it over
185
00:11:38.290 –> 00:11:41.990
and turn it over for all is therein, and
186
00:11:41.990 –> 00:11:45.750
look into it and become gray and old therein and do not
187
00:11:45.750 –> 00:11:49.350
move away from it, for you have no better portion than
188
00:11:49.350 –> 00:11:52.830
it. So first of all, I could not but be amazed.
189
00:11:52.830 –> 00:11:56.550
Rabbi, I think I’m going to quote another Gemara
190
00:11:56.550 –> 00:12:00.350
from Hagigah in a second. And there we quote a Bar Hei.
191
00:12:00.350 –> 00:12:03.790
Hei. It is kind of funny that the two
192
00:12:03.870 –> 00:12:07.390
scholars who are talking about repetition, they’re not
193
00:12:07.470 –> 00:12:10.940
funny name not only funny, but the name repeats
194
00:12:10.940 –> 00:12:14.580
itself, right? It’s fascinating. But in any case,
195
00:12:14.580 –> 00:12:18.340
what does he say? He says a few things. He says hafachbo v’
196
00:12:18.340 –> 00:12:22.180
hofachbo, which really means to go in it over and over, turn
197
00:12:22.180 –> 00:12:25.860
it over, look at it anew each time. And then he
198
00:12:25.860 –> 00:12:29.540
talks about this being a life endeavor, grow gray and
199
00:12:29.540 –> 00:12:33.380
old with it. And then something that I had tried to ignore last
200
00:12:33.380 –> 00:12:37.060
time I mentioned this Mishnah, he says, don’t go to other sources,
201
00:12:37.840 –> 00:12:41.560
stay with this source and keep at it.
202
00:12:41.560 –> 00:12:44.960
Keep constantly going back to it. And I think again,
203
00:12:45.520 –> 00:12:49.040
this is part of the Mishneh Torah tradition
204
00:12:49.280 –> 00:12:52.760
that we are exploring today. But it’s a
205
00:12:52.760 –> 00:12:56.520
wonderful seminal expression, is it not? Yeah,
206
00:12:56.520 –> 00:13:00.280
well, and don’t move away from it, tell, you know, because that’s,
207
00:13:00.280 –> 00:13:04.120
that’s people’s, that’s what generally you do after
208
00:13:04.120 –> 00:13:07.790
you go through something and once or a few times you tend
209
00:13:07.790 –> 00:13:11.030
to move on to the next thing. And what they say is when it comes
210
00:13:11.030 –> 00:13:14.670
to Torah, don’t move on to the next thing, but continue to
211
00:13:14.670 –> 00:13:18.310
focus on this. Absolutely, absolutely. And
212
00:13:18.470 –> 00:13:22.150
I think that we are going to see and it is going to blow us
213
00:13:22.150 –> 00:13:25.550
away. I hope that Seneca, the Roman
214
00:13:25.550 –> 00:13:29.270
philosopher, said something very similar. And I’m curious
215
00:13:29.270 –> 00:13:33.070
to know whether anyone listening or you, Rabbi, think that there might
216
00:13:33.070 –> 00:13:36.550
have been some influence. But let’s continue. In Hagiga, the
217
00:13:36.550 –> 00:13:40.130
Gmorra records another discussion between Bar Hei Hei
218
00:13:40.290 –> 00:13:44.050
and Hillel. Bar Hei Hei said to Hillel, what is the
219
00:13:44.050 –> 00:13:47.770
meaning of that which is written? Then you shall again discern between
220
00:13:47.770 –> 00:13:51.570
the righteous and the wicked, between he who serves God and he who does
221
00:13:51.570 –> 00:13:55.170
not serve him. This is a verse in Malachi. There are
222
00:13:55.170 –> 00:13:59.010
two redundancies, the righteous who serves and the wicked.
223
00:13:59.250 –> 00:14:02.290
So what does he answer? He says one who
224
00:14:02.290 –> 00:14:05.850
reviews his studies 100 times is
225
00:14:05.850 –> 00:14:08.850
not comparable to one who reviews his studies
226
00:14:09.390 –> 00:14:13.230
101 times. And then I love the
227
00:14:13.230 –> 00:14:16.950
fact that they use the modern day equivalent
228
00:14:16.950 –> 00:14:20.510
of an Uber driver, the donkey
229
00:14:20.510 –> 00:14:24.230
drivers, as proof. And what they say is if
230
00:14:24.230 –> 00:14:27.750
you buy a pack of tickets from the donkey
231
00:14:27.750 –> 00:14:31.470
driver for 10 and you need to get an 11th
232
00:14:31.470 –> 00:14:35.310
ride, you’ve got to buy 20. So what they’re trying to say is
233
00:14:35.390 –> 00:14:39.030
it’s not incrementally. One more now you’re
234
00:14:39.030 –> 00:14:42.730
going into the next hundred of studying.
235
00:14:42.890 –> 00:14:46.570
But I think what they’re also saying, and I might be going out on a
236
00:14:46.570 –> 00:14:50.130
ledge here, is that this is practical. You can learn it
237
00:14:50.130 –> 00:14:53.610
from real life. You can learn it from donkey drivers.
238
00:14:53.850 –> 00:14:57.370
This need to repeat stuff is
239
00:14:57.850 –> 00:15:01.450
powerful tool for pedagogy and for learning.
240
00:15:01.930 –> 00:15:05.730
The idea is, of course, if you buy the extra, if you
241
00:15:05.730 –> 00:15:09.400
need the extra ride, you have to buy the extra. Tag is that you should
242
00:15:09.400 –> 00:15:13.080
always be looking forward, you know, always study more. You may not
243
00:15:13.080 –> 00:15:16.920
know yet that you need to study more, but always be looking
244
00:15:16.920 –> 00:15:20.560
forward to studying more. It’s a great image, right? It’s the Uber driver
245
00:15:20.560 –> 00:15:24.120
image. It’s a good image, though. We don’t buy Uber tickets. We don’t buy
246
00:15:24.120 –> 00:15:27.920
Uber tickets by the 10. No, not that. If they listen to
247
00:15:27.920 –> 00:15:31.760
the podcast, they might come out with that idea. It’ll be a new subscription
248
00:15:31.760 –> 00:15:34.840
model. But, you know, I didn’t put it in the show notes, but I think
249
00:15:34.840 –> 00:15:38.440
Malcolm Gladwell once talked about the difference
250
00:15:38.440 –> 00:15:42.260
between good to great is practice, practice. And he actually kind
251
00:15:42.260 –> 00:15:46.060
of documented how many times the Beatles practiced, how many times
252
00:15:46.060 –> 00:15:49.420
musicians and actors practice. There is no question
253
00:15:49.580 –> 00:15:52.940
that repetition is something that
254
00:15:53.180 –> 00:15:56.940
is coming across loud and clear in our
255
00:15:57.020 –> 00:16:00.820
tradition. And it’s worth stopping and focusing on, I
256
00:16:00.820 –> 00:16:04.500
believe so. In the Talmud, In Avodah Zarah 19A,
257
00:16:04.500 –> 00:16:08.140
it says the Gemara cites other statements relating
258
00:16:08.140 –> 00:16:11.850
to Torah study. Rava said that Rav Sephora said that
259
00:16:11.850 –> 00:16:15.570
Rav Huna says, what is the meaning of that which is written?
260
00:16:15.730 –> 00:16:18.690
Wealth gotten through vanity,
261
00:16:18.930 –> 00:16:22.770
Mehevl shall be diminished, but he who gathers little
262
00:16:22.770 –> 00:16:26.450
by little shall increase. It’s a verse
263
00:16:26.450 –> 00:16:30.090
in Proverbs. It says, what is the meaning if a
264
00:16:30.090 –> 00:16:33.650
person turns his Torah into many bundles,
265
00:16:33.810 –> 00:16:36.530
they take the word hevel and they change it into
266
00:16:36.770 –> 00:16:40.570
chavilot, which is in modern day Hebrew, when you come back from the
267
00:16:40.570 –> 00:16:43.830
grocery store with a bunch of packages, you’re carrying
268
00:16:43.830 –> 00:16:47.430
chavilot. By studying large amount in short
269
00:16:47.430 –> 00:16:50.950
period of time without reviewing his Torah will
270
00:16:50.950 –> 00:16:54.470
diminish. But if he gathers his knowledge little by
271
00:16:54.470 –> 00:16:58.110
little, by studying slowly and reviewing his
272
00:16:58.110 –> 00:17:01.830
knowledge, that shall increase. So here
273
00:17:01.830 –> 00:17:05.670
again, what they’re looking at in, in the yeshiva, we
274
00:17:05.670 –> 00:17:09.150
would call bekiyus and b’iyun
275
00:17:09.630 –> 00:17:12.740
a normal nomenclature we would call
276
00:17:12.810 –> 00:17:16.410
encyclopedic study and a study in
277
00:17:16.410 –> 00:17:20.170
depth. And that’s a good translation
278
00:17:20.170 –> 00:17:22.730
of terms that you really never ever translate.
279
00:17:25.610 –> 00:17:28.810
And now a word from our Sponsor.
280
00:17:29.370 –> 00:17:32.850
If there’s one thing we value at Madlik Podcast, it’s reading
281
00:17:32.850 –> 00:17:36.690
texts and talking about them. That’s why I’m excited to
282
00:17:36.690 –> 00:17:40.490
share something I created called VoiceGift PLAY. It fits in
283
00:17:40.490 –> 00:17:44.290
the palm of your hand like a remote control and clips onto any book.
284
00:17:44.610 –> 00:17:48.090
It’s inspired by those old school museum audio
285
00:17:48.090 –> 00:17:51.690
guides, but this is personal. VoiceGift PLAY
286
00:17:51.690 –> 00:17:54.210
stores up to 10 hours of audio across
287
00:17:54.450 –> 00:17:57.650
999 numbered recordings.
288
00:17:58.130 –> 00:18:01.570
You simply enter a number to record a comment, memory or
289
00:18:01.570 –> 00:18:05.320
explanation, and enter the same number to play it back.
290
00:18:05.640 –> 00:18:08.680
It’s perfect for B’nai Mitzvah, practicing their layning,
291
00:18:08.920 –> 00:18:12.680
capturing grandpa’s favorite tune, or recording Chad Gad
292
00:18:12.680 –> 00:18:16.280
Yah in a voice that matters. Go to
293
00:18:16.280 –> 00:18:18.560
voice.gift, that’s
294
00:18:18.560 –> 00:18:22.280
http://www.voice.gift
295
00:18:22.520 –> 00:18:25.880
and use code MADLIK for 15% off.
296
00:18:26.680 –> 00:18:29.560
Thanks. And now back to our podcast.
297
00:18:32.050 –> 00:18:35.730
So it really is, I must say I tried to do Daf
298
00:18:35.730 –> 00:18:39.170
Yomi for about a year and a half. That’s all I lasted. You didn’t enjoy
299
00:18:39.170 –> 00:18:42.730
it because you couldn’t really understand it, right? I love to dive
300
00:18:42.730 –> 00:18:46.210
deep. I love to dive deep and not so wide. Me too. And
301
00:18:46.210 –> 00:18:49.810
that’s, and that’s what we do on Madlik week in and week
302
00:18:49.810 –> 00:18:53.650
out. But I love the fact that the rabbis are
303
00:18:53.650 –> 00:18:57.450
talking about pedagogy and they’re talking about
304
00:18:57.450 –> 00:19:01.290
it in a very profound way and
305
00:19:01.290 –> 00:19:04.830
they’re saying that you have to, you have
306
00:19:04.830 –> 00:19:08.590
to take your study in little bite
307
00:19:08.590 –> 00:19:12.430
sized pieces and then savor them and go over them and
308
00:19:12.430 –> 00:19:15.550
review them. And that is in fact
309
00:19:16.270 –> 00:19:20.110
the biggest, I think, way to ensure
310
00:19:20.830 –> 00:19:24.670
that they affect you and they change the way your life
311
00:19:24.670 –> 00:19:28.430
is. And you know, I have a friend who’s a,
312
00:19:29.120 –> 00:19:32.800
a defense lawyer for criminals and
313
00:19:33.360 –> 00:19:36.960
when it comes to the police and lawyers, they have
314
00:19:36.960 –> 00:19:40.760
techniques about making the
315
00:19:40.760 –> 00:19:44.320
potential criminal repeat the story over and over again.
316
00:19:44.640 –> 00:19:48.320
We all know they divide the people if there were two culprits
317
00:19:48.480 –> 00:19:51.200
to get variations of the story.
318
00:19:52.080 –> 00:19:55.520
But just having the same person repeat the story
319
00:19:55.600 –> 00:19:58.640
over again is to look for consistency
320
00:19:59.520 –> 00:20:03.100
they have getting new details. Asking an
321
00:20:03.100 –> 00:20:06.540
individual to walk through an event again often
322
00:20:06.620 –> 00:20:10.380
leads to reminiscence, remembering minor details that didn’t
323
00:20:10.380 –> 00:20:13.900
seem important in the first telling. I love this
324
00:20:13.900 –> 00:20:17.260
increasing cognitive load. So
325
00:20:17.500 –> 00:20:21.340
by by asking someone to recount the subject and
326
00:20:21.340 –> 00:20:24.540
write it over again, maybe outside of
327
00:20:24.540 –> 00:20:28.220
chronological order, increases the mental
328
00:20:28.220 –> 00:20:31.980
effort required, which makes people say things that they might not
329
00:20:32.360 –> 00:20:36.080
thought of before or make them slip. I think that it’s
330
00:20:36.080 –> 00:20:39.400
a fascinating mirror to look at how
331
00:20:39.400 –> 00:20:42.600
lawyers and police use
332
00:20:42.760 –> 00:20:46.200
repetition to try to get to
333
00:20:46.840 –> 00:20:50.360
the truth. And clearly there’s always going to be cross
334
00:20:50.360 –> 00:20:54.120
examination. But you have all of this in the way
335
00:20:54.120 –> 00:20:57.840
that our texts are studied. And I think what comes clear from this,
336
00:20:57.840 –> 00:21:01.580
I’d love to know your take is that we have nothing to hide. In other
337
00:21:01.580 –> 00:21:03.820
words, we are willing to
338
00:21:05.660 –> 00:21:09.460
project and to enable our texts to be
339
00:21:09.460 –> 00:21:13.140
looked at in multiple ways. We are not afraid of
340
00:21:13.140 –> 00:21:16.899
the variant readings. If you go back to that concept
341
00:21:16.899 –> 00:21:20.540
of different texts make it into the canon,
342
00:21:21.100 –> 00:21:24.060
I just think it’s a wonderful lens to look at this through
343
00:21:24.860 –> 00:21:27.820
in terms of the techniques we use.
344
00:21:30.110 –> 00:21:33.870
Torah is a. Is an old famous idea, right? There are 70
345
00:21:34.030 –> 00:21:37.790
faces to the Torah. So that’s interesting. Rabbi Lamb, who was the president
346
00:21:37.790 –> 00:21:41.550
of Yeshiva University, his book is called 70 Faces of
347
00:21:41.550 –> 00:21:45.270
the Torah, his collection of his sermons, because there are so many different
348
00:21:45.270 –> 00:21:48.830
ways to look at it. And that’s what’s so great. You know, Madlik is like
349
00:21:48.830 –> 00:21:52.510
the rabbi sermon. He gives a sermon on the same portion every
350
00:21:52.510 –> 00:21:56.230
single year. And the good rabbi knows how to turn it over and
351
00:21:56.230 –> 00:21:59.480
over 70 different, different ways. But again,
352
00:22:01.080 –> 00:22:04.280
I think the shivim panim l’Torah, that there were 70
353
00:22:04.440 –> 00:22:07.720
faces to the Torah. And the other phrase that I used
354
00:22:10.360 –> 00:22:14.120
that this and this. And what of course you’re referring to is,
355
00:22:14.120 –> 00:22:17.760
you know, the joke about the rabbi who talks to a husband and wife or
356
00:22:17.760 –> 00:22:21.440
having an argument, and he comes out and he goes, well, the wife is
357
00:22:21.440 –> 00:22:24.760
right. And then he listens to the husband and he goes, the husband is right.
358
00:22:25.000 –> 00:22:28.320
So his rebbitzin asks him, how can they both be right? And he goes, you’re
359
00:22:28.320 –> 00:22:32.060
right. Also, you’re. The point is that
360
00:22:32.060 –> 00:22:34.580
by saying shivim panimla Torah, especially
361
00:22:35.700 –> 00:22:39.300
when it comes to a sacred text, I think is
362
00:22:39.300 –> 00:22:42.980
radical because what we’re saying is that there,
363
00:22:42.980 –> 00:22:46.580
at least from our perspective, there is
364
00:22:46.660 –> 00:22:50.260
no ultimate truth. There are different faces,
365
00:22:50.820 –> 00:22:54.660
different lenses that we can look at and different
366
00:22:54.660 –> 00:22:58.160
reflections that. That reflect maybe the same kernel.
367
00:22:58.560 –> 00:23:02.280
But clearly, we submit is
368
00:23:02.280 –> 00:23:05.920
the word I was looking for. We submit our texts
369
00:23:06.160 –> 00:23:10.000
to the same type of critical review that I think
370
00:23:10.160 –> 00:23:13.840
is in a court of law, even if that’s capital punishment and
371
00:23:13.840 –> 00:23:17.680
criminal law. Fantastic. So
372
00:23:18.000 –> 00:23:21.840
what I discovered, and I discovered it from a
373
00:23:21.840 –> 00:23:25.680
amazing article. It was an op ed in
374
00:23:25.760 –> 00:23:29.580
the New York Times this past week. And
375
00:23:29.740 –> 00:23:33.580
what the Op ed was called is There’s an ancient
376
00:23:33.740 –> 00:23:37.260
solution to our modern crisis of attention.
377
00:23:37.660 –> 00:23:41.300
It was written BY A professor, S.J. Murray, who is a
378
00:23:41.300 –> 00:23:44.540
professor of great texts and creative writing at
379
00:23:44.540 –> 00:23:47.580
Baylor University. And he quotes
380
00:23:47.580 –> 00:23:51.260
Seneca. I had Never realized that Lucius
381
00:23:51.260 –> 00:23:54.980
Aeneas Seneca was. He lived in. He
382
00:23:54.980 –> 00:23:58.740
was born in Cordova, Spain in 4 B.C. i
383
00:23:58.740 –> 00:24:02.480
mean, Cordova is. You didn’t know that anybody was in Cordova Spain
384
00:24:02.480 –> 00:24:06.160
in 4 BC he wasn’t. And maybe what. He left
385
00:24:06.160 –> 00:24:09.960
a few things in the water because Cordova, what is.
386
00:24:10.200 –> 00:24:12.840
Is. Is a key city.
387
00:24:13.720 –> 00:24:17.320
Many great scholars passed through many. The Rambam was
388
00:24:17.320 –> 00:24:21.160
there from southern Spain. That’s where the Rambam was born. Yeah, it’s very
389
00:24:21.160 –> 00:24:24.760
important there. Okay, so there was something in the water.
390
00:24:24.760 –> 00:24:28.280
But again, putting it into context, this is before
391
00:24:28.920 –> 00:24:32.700
the rabbis of the Talmud. And I would say
392
00:24:32.700 –> 00:24:36.500
that Seneca could have been fairly widely read. Listen to what
393
00:24:36.500 –> 00:24:40.020
he says. And now I’m quoting from
394
00:24:40.180 –> 00:24:43.620
letters from a Stoic. Letter number two.
395
00:24:44.100 –> 00:24:47.940
Judging from what you tell me and from what I hear, I feel that you
396
00:24:47.940 –> 00:24:51.140
show great promise. I think he’s writing to a student.
397
00:24:51.540 –> 00:24:55.260
You do not tear from place to place and unsettle yourself with
398
00:24:55.260 –> 00:24:58.980
one move after another another restlessness of that sort
399
00:24:58.980 –> 00:25:02.780
is symptomatic of a sick mind. Nothing
400
00:25:02.780 –> 00:25:06.140
to my way of thinking is a better proof of a well
401
00:25:06.140 –> 00:25:09.700
ordered mind than a man’s ability to stop
402
00:25:09.940 –> 00:25:13.580
just where he is and pass some time in his own
403
00:25:13.580 –> 00:25:17.380
company. Be careful, however, that there is no element
404
00:25:17.380 –> 00:25:21.220
of discursiveness and desulteriness about his. This reading
405
00:25:21.220 –> 00:25:24.900
you refer to this reading of many different authors
406
00:25:24.900 –> 00:25:28.050
and books of every every description.
407
00:25:28.450 –> 00:25:32.090
You should be extending your stay among writers whose
408
00:25:32.090 –> 00:25:35.890
genius is unquestionable, deriving constant nourishment
409
00:25:35.890 –> 00:25:39.690
from them. If you wish to gain anything from your reading that will
410
00:25:39.690 –> 00:25:43.490
find a lasting place in your mind. To be everywhere
411
00:25:43.650 –> 00:25:46.050
is to be nowhere. It’s a great phrase.
412
00:25:47.410 –> 00:25:50.570
People. He could have been an
413
00:25:50.570 –> 00:25:54.330
existentialist. People who spend their whole life traveling
414
00:25:54.330 –> 00:25:57.850
abroad end up having plenty of places where they can find
415
00:25:57.850 –> 00:26:01.390
hospitality, but no real friendships. The
416
00:26:01.390 –> 00:26:04.710
same must needs be the case with people who never set about
417
00:26:04.710 –> 00:26:08.390
acquiring an intimate acquaintanceship with any one
418
00:26:08.390 –> 00:26:11.310
great writer, but skip from one to another,
419
00:26:11.710 –> 00:26:15.430
paying flying visits to all of them. I mean, this
420
00:26:15.430 –> 00:26:19.070
is the second part of Hofach bo or Hofach bo
421
00:26:19.230 –> 00:26:22.670
that he says you’ve got even until your old age.
422
00:26:22.990 –> 00:26:26.750
These are your friends and you’ve got to come back to them
423
00:26:26.830 –> 00:26:30.350
over and over again. And then he says something
424
00:26:30.810 –> 00:26:34.170
that this op ed picks up on. And actually the
425
00:26:34.170 –> 00:26:37.890
professor says he literally uses it. And Rabbi, I
426
00:26:37.890 –> 00:26:41.410
have to say, because I prepare for Madlik every
427
00:26:41.410 –> 00:26:45.050
week, I end up doing this organically.
428
00:26:45.370 –> 00:26:49.130
He says each day to acquire
429
00:26:49.290 –> 00:26:52.930
something which will help you to face poverty or death
430
00:26:52.930 –> 00:26:56.330
and other ills as well. After running over a lot of different
431
00:26:56.410 –> 00:26:59.870
thoughts, pick out one. One to be digested
432
00:26:59.870 –> 00:27:03.670
throughout that day. This is what I do myself, he
433
00:27:03.670 –> 00:27:07.110
says. Out of the many bits I have been reading,
434
00:27:07.350 –> 00:27:10.710
I lay hold of one. So fantastic.
435
00:27:11.510 –> 00:27:15.270
So it’s like every week I tried to pick a nugget and
436
00:27:15.270 –> 00:27:18.710
I’ve got to say, you’re thinking about it. You have to do that.
437
00:27:18.870 –> 00:27:22.550
Because to be everywhere is to be nowhere. So if you
438
00:27:22.550 –> 00:27:26.270
just say I want to study the Entire Parsha, you won’t be anywhere.
439
00:27:26.270 –> 00:27:28.250
You have to pick out one thing.
440
00:27:30.010 –> 00:27:33.370
It’s truly amazing. So this is what this
441
00:27:33.690 –> 00:27:36.810
professor writes in the New York Times. He says
442
00:27:36.810 –> 00:27:40.410
Seneca’s concept corresponds to what psychologists call
443
00:27:40.410 –> 00:27:43.889
deep processing. By returning to the same idea
444
00:27:43.889 –> 00:27:47.530
repeatedly, we signal to our brain that the idea is
445
00:27:47.530 –> 00:27:51.050
worth moving into the architecture of long term
446
00:27:51.050 –> 00:27:54.650
memory. Each time we retrieve an idea from memory,
447
00:27:54.810 –> 00:27:58.390
we also wrap wrap it in new associations, a process
448
00:27:58.630 –> 00:28:02.310
known as reconsolidation, which ensures that
449
00:28:02.310 –> 00:28:05.990
those ideas remain relevant to our life as time
450
00:28:06.070 –> 00:28:09.750
goes on. About 2,000 years ago, the
451
00:28:09.750 –> 00:28:13.270
Roman philosopher Seneca warned of a crisis of attention.
452
00:28:13.670 –> 00:28:17.310
The problem wasn’t caused by smartphones or TikTok, writes
453
00:28:17.310 –> 00:28:20.710
this professor. It was because papyrus had become more
454
00:28:20.710 –> 00:28:24.550
widely available. As a result, scrolls became
455
00:28:24.550 –> 00:28:27.930
plentiful and wealthy leaders had access more
456
00:28:27.930 –> 00:28:31.170
texts than ever before. Seneca
457
00:28:31.170 –> 00:28:34.210
observed that the minds of those who read too many
458
00:28:34.290 –> 00:28:37.370
scrolls too quickly became restless and
459
00:28:37.370 –> 00:28:41.170
unsteady. This kind of mind was less able, he
460
00:28:41.170 –> 00:28:44.610
noted, to stay in one place and spend time with
461
00:28:44.610 –> 00:28:48.090
itself. Seneca did not have access to modern
462
00:28:48.090 –> 00:28:51.730
scientific studies or survey data. But he would
463
00:28:51.730 –> 00:28:55.290
not have been surprised by our plight. Professors
464
00:28:55.290 –> 00:28:58.970
report that students now have difficulty watching feature length
465
00:28:58.970 –> 00:29:02.190
films, let alone finishing books.
466
00:29:03.150 –> 00:29:06.910
Fantastic. And it’s right of course. So
467
00:29:06.910 –> 00:29:10.630
I just feel there were parts of the Talmud that
468
00:29:10.630 –> 00:29:14.110
I didn’t even reference. I think it was in Avodah
469
00:29:14.110 –> 00:29:17.670
Zora where they had different of the rabbis saying they
470
00:29:17.670 –> 00:29:21.510
finished reading the Parasha and one of them wanted to read Tehillim and
471
00:29:21.510 –> 00:29:24.990
another one wanted to read Mishle. And they were really
472
00:29:24.990 –> 00:29:27.870
talking. And I think the overwhelming
473
00:29:28.670 –> 00:29:32.170
approach was stick that you really
474
00:29:32.250 –> 00:29:35.850
believe in. Don’t go from book to book. But the
475
00:29:35.850 –> 00:29:39.010
parallelism of these two of
476
00:29:39.010 –> 00:29:42.730
Seneca and the Talmudic
477
00:29:42.730 –> 00:29:46.490
rabbis is amazing. One thing I will say for
478
00:29:46.490 –> 00:29:49.930
the rabbis that as much or as little
479
00:29:50.090 –> 00:29:53.450
as they reflected what they read in Seneca,
480
00:29:53.690 –> 00:29:57.090
their traditions have stayed the test of time. Whereas
481
00:29:57.090 –> 00:30:00.930
Seneca needs a New York op ed to
482
00:30:00.930 –> 00:30:04.720
remind him back. Because truly what
483
00:30:04.720 –> 00:30:08.400
we do week in and week out is truly that it’s to
484
00:30:08.560 –> 00:30:12.240
review the same material over again, to hold it
485
00:30:12.240 –> 00:30:15.840
close to us, to discover who we are, to meet old
486
00:30:15.840 –> 00:30:19.640
friends again. And of course that’s what keeps
487
00:30:19.640 –> 00:30:23.440
our tradition alive, which is why it’s why it keeps going from
488
00:30:23.440 –> 00:30:27.000
generation to generation. Okay, so that’s
489
00:30:27.000 –> 00:30:30.330
amazing. This is great. Great. Enjoy Devarim, everybody.
490
00:30:30.890 –> 00:30:34.450
Have a meaningful Tisha Bav and we will see you guys all next
491
00:30:34.450 –> 00:30:38.210
week. Be well. Enjoy Mishneh Torah. Read it
492
00:30:38.210 –> 00:30:41.930
again and read it once more. Shabbat Shalom. We’ll see you
493
00:30:41.930 –> 00:30:43.370
all next week.
494
00:30:46.090 –> 00:30:49.730
Before you go, I’d love to hear from you. Ben Bag Bag
495
00:30:49.730 –> 00:30:53.290
tells us to turn it over. Turn it over. Turn it over.
496
00:30:54.020 –> 00:30:57.660
What’s one book, one Torah passage, one prayer or even
497
00:30:57.660 –> 00:31:00.820
one song that you’ve returned to again and again?
498
00:31:01.380 –> 00:31:05.140
What did you discover the 10th time that you completely missed the first?
499
00:31:05.620 –> 00:31:08.900
Share it in the comments. I promise to read every one of them.



