Tag Archives: ishmael

The Day After

parshat chayei sara – genesis 23 -24

Join Geoffrey Stern and Rabbi Adam Mintz discussing the weekly Torah portion. What happens when ancient narratives of trauma echo through generations? This episode of “Madlik Disruptive Torah” delves into the parsha Chayei Sara, exploring the post-traumatic impact of the attempted sacrifice of Isaac. Through the lens of Jewish tradition, we examine the emotional and familial fallout experienced by Abraham, Sarah, Hagar, Isaac, and Ishmael. They pose intriguing questions: Did Abraham and Sarah live apart after the Akedah? Where did Isaac go after the attempted sacrifice by his father. How did Isaac’s near-sacrifice shape his life? The discussion weaves historical context with contemporary reflections, drawing parallels to the current conflict in Israel.

Sefaria Source Sheet: www.sefaria.org/sheets/605334

Transcript:

Welcome to Madlik.  My name is Geoffrey Stern and at Madlik we light a spark or shed some light on a Jewish Text or Tradition.  Along with Rabbi Adam Mintz we host Madlik Disruptive Torah on your favorite podcast platform and on YouTube. This week’s parsha is Chayei Sara – The post traumatic impact of the attempted sacrifice of Isaac is shared by all participants. We explore the entire narrative of Abraham, Sarah, Hagar, Isaac and Ishmael through the lens of trauma and healing and recognize the implications for our own generation.

more

So, Rabbi, another week, and we haven’t really been tying into current events recently, but when I saw the first Rashi in this week’s Parsha, I said, we’re talking about trauma. We’re talking about PTSD and you know last week when you mentioned the Akedah the binding of Isaac, I said you’re gonna have to stick around for another year before we talk about it. So, we’re not gonna really talk about it but we are going to talk about the outcomes, the impact the day after. So, there’s a lot of material. It really is not us plucking straws here.

Clearly the rabbis and the texts realize the impact of this almost sacrifice of Isaac had. So, let’s start in Genesis 23.1. It says, Chaye, Chaye Sarah, this was the lifetime of Sarah. The span of Sarah’s life came to 127 years.

And Sarah died in Kiryat Arba, that is Hevron, in the land of Canaan. And Abraham came to mourn for Sarah and to weep for her. Then Abraham rose from beside his dead and spoke to the Hittites, saying, I am a resident alien among you. Sell me a burial site among you, that I may remove my dead for burial.

Geoffrey Stern (02:14.497)

So, the first thing I noticed, Rabbi, is in the English it says, Abraham came to mourn for Sarah. It’s not quite clear if he came from across the apartment or the house, but if you look at the Hebrew, it says, v’yavauw Avraham (He literally came). I think they weren’t living together. Can you draw that conclusion from here? They were separated.

Adam Mintz (02:37.199)

I mean, you might say that after the Akedah he never returned to Sarah

Geoffrey Stern (02:42.903)

I think we’re going to see more hints and clearly that’s what the rabbis felt.

Adam Mintz (02:44.803)

Right, I think that’s the feeling you get is that they never got back together afterwards.

Geoffrey Stern (02:52.449)

So, Rashi on the verse says to bewail Sarah and to weep over her. The narrative of the death of Sarah follows immediately on that of the binding of Isaac because through the announcement of the binding that her son had been made ready for sacrifice and had almost been sacrificed, she received a great shock. Literally, her soul flew from her.

Geoffrey Stern (03:22.54)

and she died this, of course, Rashi doesn’t invent on his own. takes it from Pirkei D’ Rab Eliezar, a rabbinic source. So, the first thing that I plucked out of this, again, looking at the Hebrew, it says the binding of her son. You know when your kid does something good and you say, that’s my daughter or my son? Here it was clear.

Adam Mintz (03:42.946)

Right here.

Geoffrey Stern (03:46.007)

that maybe Abraham had more than one son, but this happened to her son. And then of course the Hebrew, parcha nishmata mimena, that her soul just flew from her is not only poetic, but it’s tragic. We’re definitely talking about she wasn’t even there, but going through the trauma took her life away from her.

Adam Mintz (04:06.785)

Right. Well, and obviously it’s the fact that she wasn’t there. Had she been there, the trauma would have been a different trauma because she would have seen the angel and know that everything was okay. So, it’s the trauma of knowing that they went not knowing what happened. And that’s, of course what the midrash says.

Geoffrey Stern (04:25.825)

Yeah. So again, we’re looking at this through the rabbinic lens. But in when it says that Abraham returned to the young men and they arose and went together to Beersheba, this is at the end of the Akedah of the binding. What Bereshit Rabba says is Abraham returned to his young men and where was Isaac?

Rabbi Birkaya, in the name of the rabbis from over there, he sent him away to Shem to learn Torah from him. So, I’m more interested, Rabbi, in the question and in the observation that already we see that after the Akeda, it seems that Abraham and Sarah were not together. Lo and behold, it also seems as though Abraham and his son Isaac, who, if you recall, when they walked up Mount Moriah it says they walked…

Adam Mintz (05:20.682)

They went together.

Geoffrey Stern (05:22.007)

together. Now they seem to be going their own way. We’re really seeing tragedy here.

Adam Mintz (05:30.547)

Right. And you know, of course, they, you know, the proof text is the fact that the word Va’ yashav is in the singular. And so only Abraham went back, not Yitzchak. So that’s very striking that that’s so. Okay, let’s take it away to the next one.

Geoffrey Stern (05:45.229)

So, following this thread, much later, we all will remember, and if not, we’ll get there in a week or so, when Isaac was old and his eyes were too dim to see, he called his elder son Esau and said to him, my son, and he answered, here I am. This clearly is the beginning of the story of the fleecing of Isaac. What’s important to the rabbis is why were his eyes dim?

Rashi on that verse says, when Isaac was bound upon the altar and his father was about, or we’ll get there in a second, the Hebrew it says, Ratzah, wanted to slay him, at that very moment the heavens opened, the ministering angels saw it and wept.

And their tears flowed and fell upon Isaac’s eyes, which thus became dim. So again, Rabbi, I have to make the diak (a Talmudic hairsplitting). It could have easily said when Isaac was, or when Abraham was commanded to kill him, it doesn’t say that. The word choice is his father wanted to kill him. Fascinating word choice. But the takeaway is that the angels

and the tears went into Isaac’s eyes and they were responsible for his eyes dimming later in life to paraphrase that he had physical, he encountered physical damage from this event. It haunted him the rest of his life.

Adam Mintz (07:27.388)

Yes, absolutely right. Now, the Haya Aviv Rotzeh l’shochet oto .. .. So, you know, we’ll see that that’s part of the tradition that Abraham wanted to actually sacrifice him. God said sacrifice them and Abraham actually wanted to sacrifice them. Now, just as a little aside, which we may get to, and that is that Rashi comes from France around the year 1,100.

That is just after the beginning of the Crusades. The Crusades in which Christians went and they gave Jews the choice either convert or be killed. So that was a very difficult time for the Jews and many Jews chose death rather than convert. There actually was a tradition then in France and Germany that Abraham actually killed Yitzchak and that Yitzchak came back to life. And that’s why it says it only in the singular. So there’s this sense

You know, and the Jews in France obviously followed in that model and they allowed themselves to be killed rather than convert. So, there’s a model that sees Abraham wanting to kill his son and maybe even actually killing him. So that you see in that word, you see Rashi, the community that Rashi is part of, the religious community that Rashi is part

Geoffrey Stern (08:47.969)

And it’s amazing that what you mentioned is a period where they were being killed by the Crusaders. Christians refer to what we refer to as the binding of Isaac as the sacrifice of Isaac. Because they actually saw it as a model of the later Jesus who was sacrificed and brought back to life. We Jews who kind of adopted that alternative

Adam Mintz (08:59.717)

Right.

Geoffrey Stern (09:15.248)

history would say that Isaac was sacrificed, he came back to life. But I’m with you. with you.

Adam Mintz (09:25.625)

Who had it first is actually the topic of an entire book written by a professor in JTS called The Last Trial written by Shalom Spiegel. So that’s it, you know, because this is not from Rashi. This is actually from earlier Midrashim. So, the question is who had it first? That’s a very interesting question. Okay, good. For next time.

Geoffrey Stern (09:44.931)

but.

But getting back to where I was coming from, your interpretation of his father wanted to slaughter him, you know, it’s one thing to want to be martyred yourself. And even as you say, there were families where the whole family was martyred. But I’m looking at it from the perspective of the damaged goods of Isaac. And from Isaac’s perspective, he looked up at his dad and his dad wanted to slaughter him. And that’s what comes across to me from this

So we are going to actually go back and look at another story very similar to the story of the sacrifice of Isaac and we’re gonna quote Shai Held a little bit who talks about almost the sacrifice of Ishmael when Sarah kicked her out of the house. I think you don’t have to be a modern scholar to see the synergy between the two stories.

of Abraham’s two sons were both almost sacrificed. I think the rabbis saw it that way. And the proof text that I bring is the Rosh Hashanah two-day services. Because in the Rosh Hashanah two-day service, we start on day one by reading from Bereshit 21. And we talk about Abraham’s first, well, in 21 is the first one, we talk about

The child grew up and was weaned and Abraham held a feast on the day that Isaac was weaned and Sarah saw the son whom Hagar the Egyptian had born to Abraham saying she said to Sarah cast out that slave woman and her son for the son of that slave shall not share in the inheritance of my son. So basically, what happened was when Sarah was barren she gave her maidservant Hagar, sometimes she’s called maidservant

Adam Mintz (11:19.894)

wife!

Geoffrey Stern (11:42.399)

servant, sometimes she becomes Abraham’s wife, but she gave it to him to bear a child on her behalf. And then when she had her own child, Isaac, all of a sudden, she said, we want you, I want you to cast her out. The matter greatly distressed Abraham, for it concerned a son of his.

Adam Mintz (11:45.813)

Wife, correct.

Geoffrey Stern (12:12.361)

So now already we sought to focus that Abraham actually did have two sons that he loved. But God said to Abraham, do not be distressed over the boy or your slave, meaning Hagar. Whatever Sarah tells you to do, do as she says. We’ve heard that before. For it is through Isaac that your offspring shall be continued for you.

Early the next morning Abraham took some bread and a skin of water, gave them to Hagar, and we all know the story. She went out into the wilderness and when the water was gone from the skin she left the child under one of the bushes and went and sat down at a distance. And a bow shot away.

For she thought, let me not look at the child as he dies. Sitting thus afar, she burst into tears. And then God came and God showed where there was water and the child was saved. Rabbi, this wasn’t the only time that Hagar was sent out from Abraham and that Sarah created stress and turmoil for her husband. Early on, even before

Isaac was born in Genesis 16.

Adam Mintz (13:36.217)

even before Ishmael was born also. She’s just pregnant in this story.

Geoffrey Stern (13:41.057)

That’s right. She’s just pregnant. what happened was and Sarai said to Abraham, look, God has kept me from bearing consort with my maid. Perhaps I shall have a child for her. And Abraham heeded Sarah’s request. So Sarah, Abraham’s wife, took her maid, Hagar, the Egyptian, after Abraham had dwelt in the land of Canaan 10 years. And she got pregnant. And Sarah said to Abraham,

the wrong done to me is your fault. So Hagar maybe looked a little bit different in Sarah’s eyes. Maybe she looked a little differently at Sarah and all of a sudden Sarah is blaming Abraham and he says the wrong done to me is your fault. I myself put my maid to your bosom. Now that she sees that she is pregnant, I am lowered in her esteem.

God decide between you and me. Again, similar to Sodom and Gomorrah, we’re asking God to be a judge, a shofet. Abraham said to Sarai, your maid is in your hands, deal with her as you think right. And then Sarah treated her harshly and she ran away from her. So, asay la ha’tov be’aynayech v’taanaha.

Adam Mintz (14:42.858)

Right

Adam Mintz (14:49.446)

you

Geoffrey Stern (15:00.681)

So here Abraham is saying, do what is right in your moral code. And Sarai sends her away harshly. Ultimately, what happens is that this Hagar is all by herself and God sends an Angel to tell her come back.

And she listens to the angel and she says in verse 13, you are Elroy, you are a god of seeing, by which she meant, have I not gone on seeing after my being son? So, she went to a place called a Baer El-Hai, El-Hai-Rai, and it was between Kaddish and Barad. So, the reason I bring this,

Adam Mintz (15:30.881)

you

Geoffrey Stern (15:53.769)

is we find out in this week’s Parsha that when Abraham sends his servant to find a wife for Isaac, Rivka comes back and they want to know where is Isaac.

Adam Mintz (16:16.859)

you

Geoffrey Stern (16:16.888)

And so she’s on her camel, she gets off the camel, and I’m looking for the verses here, and it says that Isaac, not only was he studying in the tent of shame, which is where the Midrash says he was sent, but he was

in this place called El…

Adam Mintz (16:48.254)

I think it’s earlier than that. It’s a page earlier.

Geoffrey Stern (16:51.199)

let me see where it is

Adam Mintz (16:55.118)

Yeah, there it is right there.

Mavo Be’er Lachai Rui. Sheholach Lehavi Haagar Le’Abraham Aviv Sheis Soenah.

Geoffrey Stern (17:05.005)

Perfect. So, in Genesis 24: 61, it says then Rebecca and her maids arose, mounted on the camels. They were looking for Isaac. Isaac had just come back from the vicinity of Baer-la-hai-roy, for he was settled in the region of the Negev. And Isaac went out walking in the field touring evening. So, we know two things about Isaac. Number one, he seems to have been

walking alone. was lonely. He was all by himself in the desert. And second, he settled in the same place that Hagar had her image with God and where God had saved her. What does Rashi say? Rashi picks up on this cue.

and he says that he had just come from the well, L’chaim Roy, for he had gone there to bring Hagar back to Abraham that he may take her again as a wife. So, Rabbi, the plot is very, is really thickening now. Not only was Isaac visiting Hagar, his stepmother,

Adam Mintz (18:06.623)

Amazing all the connections, right?

Geoffrey Stern (18:15.007)

But he actually was bringing Hagar back now that Sarah had been buried by Abraham and in his… He was reuniting them. So, these are basically all, all people who were affected by this drama of either the Akedat Yitzchak the binding of Isaac. I focused on a few words that tie the two together.

Adam Mintz (18:21.837)

He was reuniting them.

Geoffrey Stern (18:43.659)

In both stories of either Abraham sending Hagar out to the desert, it says that he rose up early in the morning, the same words that it uses for the binding of Isaac when he rose up, Va’yashkem Avraham Ba’Boker it says it in 21: 14

So that ties the Akedah of the binding of Isaac, his second son.

to the exiling of his first son. And then I also focused a little bit on seeing the place from afar. If you remember, Hagar was going to, she put her son Ishmael under a bush to watch him die from afar. You have the same use of the same word when they climb up Mount Moriah and they see the place from afar. So, Rabbi, whether it’s through the rabbinic lens or even the texts, it really is combining

this drama and all of the different participants in the drama together.

Adam Mintz (19:55.519)

Yes, I mean, and it seems to be important, at least to Rashi, that Abraham and Hagar become reunited. Now that of course plays on the fact that by Yehraha d’Avarbe ne Abraham, that Abraham was upset to throw Yishmael out, that he just listened to Sarah, but he had a soft spot for Hagar and Yishmael. And the minute that Sarah dies, so Yitzchak understands that, Yitzchak understands that.

and he tries to reunite them. It’s actually a great novel the way Rashti plays it.

Geoffrey Stern (20:30.861)

But everybody seems to be hurt. You know, I started in the beginning by saying, what was the first thing that Abraham did? First of all, we know he wasn’t living together because he came there. Then he talks to the Hittites and he says, I am a resident alien among you. We saw Isaac alone in the desert. These two individuals feel like strangers.

Hagar, her name means the stranger, ha-ger. These are all wounded, injured people that have been caught up in this family dynamic. And then of course, we have…

Adam Mintz (21:13.469)

Where do you see that Abraham is damaged? Because he’s not with his wife or his son. He seems to be the actor. He’s the one who’s making these decisions. Now, you might say he’s damaged deciding not to be with Yitzchak and Sarah, but it’s interesting. It seems like the other people are damaged because of what Abraham does. Like, Hagar is damaged because of what Abraham does to her.

Sarah’s damaged because Abraham didn’t include her in the Akedah. Yitzchak’s damaged because Abraham was willing to sacrifice his son. Rotsel l’shachato, like Rashi says.

Geoffrey Stern (21:50.305)

You know, you made a comment last week when we were discussing how Abraham argued with God about Sodom and Gomorrah and you said, the open question is why did he not argue with God about sacrificing Isaac? The truth is we see him arguing here, but he argued maybe he’s spilled his load with Hagar and Sarah. Remember he says to Sarah, how hurt he was. Twice he had to go through this argument and you can just feel the exasperation in his voice. You gave me this woman. I had a child with her. I love this child now. I’m worried about him. I’m worried about what he will inherit and I’m worried about this woman who bore my child to me. Do what’s right in your eyes. But ultimately, he is arguing with Sarah.

and the arguments that we would have hoped that he would have argued for Isaac. And of course, I haven’t mentioned the most important discussion that we have, which is at the beginning of the Akeda, God famously says to him, take your son, take your only son, [the one you love] take Isaac. And what does Rashi say to that?

Abraham said to God when God said, thy son, he goes, I have two sons. He answered him, thine only son. Abraham said, this one is the only son of his mother and the other is the only son of his mother. Rabbi, you couldn’t write this any better in terms of what the dynamic was.

Adam Mintz (23:35.877)

You sure couldn’t. Rashi is like listening to this podcast because Rashi is sensitive to all the things we’re saying that Abraham hasn’t forgotten about Hagar and Yishmael either.

Geoffrey Stern (23:47.745)

So, I cut off Rashi in the middle. He gets better. God then said, the one whom you lovest. Abraham replied, I love both of them. Whereupon God said, Isaac. So, he did argue with God at the Akeda, and he was hurt.

Rabbi, feel that Abraham was as hurt as any other player in this story. If anything, the one player that we haven’t really focused on is Ishmael. Because we know that after the Akedah we see that at least according to rabbinic tradition, Isaac went out. So maybe Abraham sent him off to Yeshiva for a gap year. I’m not sure, but certainly Isaac did not go with his father.

Adam Mintz (24:10.501)

Good, that’s good. Okay.

Adam Mintz (24:35.098)

Right, that’s correct.

Geoffrey Stern (24:35.303)

and he didn’t go back to his mother. Then after his mother dies and his father says, I’m a stranger in this land, and he sees his basically he has a dysfunctional family. So then he goes to find Hagar and to kind of I would say he’s trying to be talked about in the beginning we’re going to talk about trauma and healing. He’s trying to heal. Abraham’s trying to heal. Part of what Abraham does is he buries Sarah.

Adam Mintz (25:04.129)

Right. And what about the fact that Yitzchak and Yishmael together bury Abraham? So you see this reconciliation between Yitzchak and Yishmael.

Geoffrey Stern (25:04.525)

in with honor. But then…

Geoffrey Stern (25:11.021)

So.

Geoffrey Stern (25:14.817)

So we know and we can read between the lines that especially Ishmael as a young child, he was misachiek, he laughed at Isaac. But besides that, we don’t see real arguments between him the way we see between, for instance, Yaakov and Easav – Easu But we imply that they have issues as well. And as you say, at the end of our, at the end of our parsha, it says,

big no big surprise here Genesis 25 Abraham took a knife a wife whose name was Keturah. Rashi says Keturah this is Hagar she was named Keturah because her deeds were as beautiful and sweet as incest Keturet.

So in fact, Isaac was onto something. Abraham did get married to Hagar. And then in 25, 8, it says, breathed his last dying at a good ripe old age and contented. And he was gathered to his kin. His sons, Isaac and Ishmael, buried him in the cave of Machpelah in the field of Ephron, son of Zohar, the Hittite facing Mamre. So the rabbis, and Rashi brings the rabbis, notice

that Isaac and Ishmael buried him is not in the order of birth. Isaac was the second son, Ishmael was the first. It says, from this we gather that Ishmael repented of his evil ways. Mekhan assa Ishmael teshuvah, I would translate it as either repented or returned. It doesn’t say anything about evil ways.

Adam Mintz (26:58.881)

Right.

Geoffrey Stern (26:58.979)

So, Sa’yasa Ismail t’shuva. He did some, how would you translate to te’shuva not meaning as repenting.

Adam Mintz (27:07.085)

I would say there was a reconciliation.

Geoffrey Stern (27:10.179)

Perfect. That’s the word I wanted. Reconciliation in terms of teshuvah So they did get back together. And this, according to Rashi, is what is meant by a good old age mentioned in connection with Abraham. So Rabbi, a degree, we do have some ends tied. But there’s a lot of hurt. There’s a lot of damage here. And I think even if you look at how the…

the children of Ishmael, let’s talk about Arabs and Islam. They believe that it was Ishmael who was sacrificed. The truth is, I looked it up in Wikipedia, and the truth is that according to Wikipedia, they are…

In fact, it is estimated that 131 traditions say Isaac was the son, while 133 says Ishmael. Such a dispute over which son suggests that the story and where and to whom it happens is extremely important. I will say that in terms of Eid al-Adha, which is a Muslim holiday that occurs once a year,

Adam Mintz (28:10.89)

It’s amazing, right?

Geoffrey Stern (28:27.543)

That is a celebration, a commemoration of the slaughter of an animal with regard to this Akedah, whoever was sacrificed. So again, the sacrificial part of it is the hurt part of it. And the nations of both of these children of Abraham suffered. I don’t think that Abraham ever got over it. I think he kind of cashed in his chips.

And he left it to the next generations, but I would argue Rabbi that This is the beginning of a new chapter in the history and the story of the Jewish people. It’s a chapter dealing with trauma and the rest of our history, whether it’s going down to Egypt where Hagar came from, is a question of how we heal from trauma. This is

Adam Mintz (29:22.515)

PTSD.

Geoffrey Stern (29:23.991)

It is PTSD. I’ll only finish by saying that Amos Oz said, and I’ll quote him a little bit. He says that the people living in Israel today, these are those who were kicked out of the Arab and Islamic lands and who came from the infernal in Europe. And he says, those who survived by the skin of their teeth in Arab and Islamic,

hatred for Jews and also came to the land of Israel so as I have often said says Amos Oz Israel is essentially a refugee camp so is Palestine which is what makes this conflict so tragic it’s a conflict a tragic conflict between two victims between two refugee camps everybody in the ancient story

that we study this week is a refugee and everybody back in the land today is a refugee and is suffering post-traumatic syndrome.

Adam Mintz (30:23.783)

That’s a remarkable quote from Amos Oz

Geoffrey Stern (30:27.827)

I opened up the Atlanta Atlantic magazine and they have an amazing article. It’s called How to Build a Palestinian State and it’s by Samer Sinijlawi And he was a Palestinian who was in Israeli prison and when he was in Israeli prison he writes, he got to know Israelis and I saw for the first time that these people who I had feared as my oppressors

had their own fears, he writes. They were scared of us, the Palestinians, of the violence we might cause them, of the violence we were causing them. It’s hard for my people, oppressed as we feel by Israeli power, to appreciate this. But the fears of Israelis are real, not exaggerated, not invented. The images of October 7th are seared into their minds. Especially since the massacre, they desire the sort of security that any of us would want.

and they will never bargain away the safety of their families. So, he’s gotten together with Olmert, the past prime minister, and what he’s saying is when, please God, this war is over, Rabbi, the one thing that the Palestinians and Israelis will have in common is their trauma. The one thing that they will have in common is their suffering. And hopefully they can use this shared suffering and shared trauma

to try to figure out where they can find refuge. That’s, me, there are no easy answers. There are no easy answers in our parsha and there are no easy answers in current events. But that’s my kind of takeaway.

Adam Mintz (32:03.074)

That’s remarkable. This was remarkable today. Yasher Koach Geoffrey Shabbat Shalom to everybody and we look forward to seeing you next week where we’re going to look at Yitzchak and see whether that trauma, actually whether Yitzchak grew out of that trauma or whether that defined the rest of his life. Shabbat Shalom.

Geoffrey Stern (32:19.639)

Shabbat shalom. See you all next week.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Call me Ishmael

parshat lech lecha, genesis 16 – 25

Join Geoffrey Stern and Rabbi Adam Mintz recorded on Clubhouse on November 3rd 2022. We discover that when the younger son Isaac is chosen, the older son Ishmael’s banishment in some way endears him to his father and latter Rabbinic and Muslim commentators. By being rejected Ishmael may actually provide an alter ego of the Jewish people. We will discuss…

Sefaria Source sheet: www.sefaria.org/sheets/442342

Transcript:

Welcome to Madlik.  My name is Geoffrey Stern and at Madlik we light a spark or shed some light on a Jewish Text or Tradition.  Along with Rabbi Adam Mintz, we host Madlik Disruptive Torah on clubhouse every Thursday at 8:00pm Eastern and share it as the Madlik podcast on your favorite platform. This week’s Torah portion is Lech Lecha, normally associated with the birth of the Jewish people.  Reading it afresh this year we discover that when the younger son Isaac is chosen, it is at the expense of the older son Ishmael’s banishment.  We explore how Ishmael’s role as the outcast in some way endears him to his father and latter Rabbinic and Muslim commentators. By being rejected Ishmael may actually provide an alter ego and narrative to the Jewish people. So with apologies to Herman Melville, join us for Call Me Ishmael.

more

So yeah, we’re going back to Moby Dick. It feels like we’re back in high school. For those of you who have forgotten your high school class in literature, it is the first three words of Moby Dick. And he Ishmael is the narrator of the whole story. And he kind of disappears. He’s characterized as someone with little or no money in his purse, nothing to do. He says, If I stay here any longer, I’m gonna start hitting people. So that’s when I take to the sea. So he’s kind of a wanderer. And maybe that’s why Melville called them Ishmael. But more important to us, he kind of disappears in the narrative until the end when he’s the only survivor. So normally, as I said, in the intro, when we read Lech Lecha, we are focused on the birth of the Jewish people on the amazing narrative, of Avram and Sarai leaving their homeland and going on this amazing journey and pilgrimage. But along the way, we get this breadth of Ishmael this other character, who, like Ishmael in Moby Dick appears, and then seemingly kind of a disappears. So, I think I’d like to introduce this whole episode, because we are talking about Isaac and Ishmael, the two sons of Abraham, with a quote from Robert Alter, the great modern commentary as literature on the Bible. And he says the entire Book of Genesis is about the reversal of the iron law of primogeniture, about the election through some devious twist of destiny of a youngest son to carry on the line. So, if last week, we talked about the flip side of choosing a Noah choosing an Abraham was regretting another choice. Today, we’re going to talk about if the narrative of all of Genesis is choosing, not the firstborn son, the second born son, and then the flip side of that is the rejection of the firstborn son. Or to put it in a more ironic way. If primogeniture is a sense of entitlement of the first born, the Bible systemically rejects the first boy. So it’s the rejection of the entitled, if you will. And that’s kind of an interesting way to look at the, the dynamics of not only Ishmael and Isaac, but Esau and Yaakov. What do you think, Rabbi?

Adam Mintz  04:05

I mean, that is the story. Actually, last week, we were given a little glimpse of that, because the story of Noah getting drunk after the flood, there was Shem, Ham and Yefet, and the one who’s really chosen is sham, who turns out to be the youngest son. So, we get that a little bit there. But here for the first time, we get the idea that Abraham has two sons, Ishmael should have been the chosen son. He was born, you know, Sarah suggested that he bear a child with Hagar with the maidservant. And he was born and he should have been the one and there should not have been any story. But Sarah gets jealous and God tells Abraham to listen to Sarah. So, the story is the fact that the older one is put aside for the younger one. And the famous introduction to the story of the binding of Isaac tells us that God says to Abraham, take your son, your favorite son, the son that you like more than anybody else. And Rashi says, why does he have to say so many things just take, say, your son, take your son, there’s no reason to take your son. He says, I have two sons. Take your son you love. He says, I have two sons that I love. Take the son that she only wanted. Well, I have two sons, the only one so they’re two. They’re one mother. And so therefore, Abraham wasn’t so sure which son it was. God had to tell him which son it was,

Geoffrey Stern  05:33

Man, you hit the nail on the head, right There’s no question about it. I think to me, what’s intriguing is when you systemically, reject the firstborn, and you pick what you normally call the runt of the litter, then the first port becomes the rejected. And that’s kind of what’s fascinating here. And it’s fascinating, as you say, when in that episode, where God says, pick your son, Abraham keeps going back to his quote, unquote, rejected son, who is the first born. So here we go. We are in Genesis 16. And Sarai, Abraham’s wife had bought him no children, and she had an Egyptian maid servant whose name was Hagar. And so, I said to Abram, look, God has kept me from bearing. Consort with my maid, perhaps I shall have a child through her. And Abraham headed Saria’s request. So, I Abam’s wife took her maid Hagar the Egyptian, after Abraham had dwelt in the land of Canaan 10 years, and gave her to her husband Abraham as a concubine. I just want to note that the Hebrew here is וַתִּתֵּ֥ן אֹתָ֛הּ לְאַבְרָ֥ם אִישָׁ֖הּ ל֥וֹ לְאִשָּֽׁה. So even though the translation is a concubine, I think Rabbi you’ll agree with me אִישָׁ֖הּ ל֥וֹ לְאִשָּֽׁה  is as a wife, in a sense. So, then it goes on. And he says, And he cohabitated with Hagar, and she conceived, and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was lowered and her esteem. So here if you give me a little literary license, either Hagar God looked down upon Sarai, because actually, she had delivered and Sarai was barren, or Sarai is somehow projecting on to what Hagar must be thinking, because then it says in verse five, and Sarai said to Abram, the one done to me is your fault. She blames it on Abram, I, myself, put my maid in your bosom now that she sees that she is pregnant, and I am lowered in her esteem, God decide between you and me, Abram said to Sarai your maid is in your hands deal with her as you think right, then, so Sarai treated her harshly, and she ran away from her. So there is a lot of focus later, when Ishmael is actually born, that he misbehaves, and he is thrown out of the house, but tellingly, even here, before he is born, Sarai sees a reflection in her Hagar’s attitude, and already acts in such a manner that Hagar ran away? That is pretty profound, don’t you think?

Adam Mintz  08:54

It is pretty profound, you know, think about what it means to run away. Here’s a maid servant. She’s has nothing. She comes from Egypt. She’s living in the home, let’s say of a successful man, you know, in Canaan, if she runs away, she’s nothing. Can you imagine, people lead like an au pair, who comes from a foreign country running away from the family that she’s working for? They’re helpless. So it’s a big deal that she runs away. It must have been pretty horrible.

Geoffrey Stern  09:24

So runaway is one way to look at it. But if the circumstances were such as though she had no choice, in a sense, she was exiled. She was pushed out and remember as a Jew, reading the Bible, I have a certain sensitivity to people who are exiled. So that becomes a fascinating double entendre here, and then it goes on … and remember, Ishmael is not born yet. A messenger of God found her by a Spring of water in the wilderness the spring on the road to Shur, (8) and said, “Hagar, slave of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?” And she says, I’m running from my mistress. And he says, Go back to your mistress submit to her harsh treatment. And then the messenger of God says in verse 10, I will greatly increase your offspring, and they shall be too many to count, the Messenger of God said to her further, behold, you are pregnant and shall bear a son, you shall call him Ishmael.  So, it’s almost a parallel story of a latest story that we will read, where a Sarah actually rejects and throws out Hagar. she also comes to a spring of water. And she also is given a blessing. This is almost like practice, like when children watch the scary movie over and over again, so that they can wrap their arms around it, but already, you get a sense of there is this respect, and this sensitivity, and this simpatico with Ishmael. The Rabbis said that there were only a few people who were named before they were born. And Ishmael is one. So here you shall call him Ishmael… he’s in a select few of people. As much as we know the later story just forgets about Ishmael. At this point. You could almost say to me, I don’t know where this story is going. I don’t know who’s going to be the hero.

Adam Mintz  11:49

Yeah, I mean, that’s good. Let me just to go back to just said somebody good things here. The fact that the story in this week’s power shot and next week’s PowerShell are basically you know, the same story. There’s only one difference in this week’s parsha Hagar gets banished in next week’s Parasha she doesn’t like Ishmael, Ishmael is a bad influence on her son. So, what happens to Hagar in both the cases is the same. But Sarah’s view is different. In this week’s parsha, you have this funny thing she’s competitive, you have to understand that right? He’s taking another wife. Not really, because clearly they had this idea of maidservants. But Sarah get’s jealous. Next week, she’s worried about the kid. And he’s a bad influence, the older son, which we can understand right… the teenage brother who gets the younger brother in trouble?

Geoffrey Stern  12:45

Absolutely. You know, normally, when we discuss a parsha, we don’t talk about what happens at toward the end. But I think that’s why my comment about Moby Dick and Melville is so important that Ismael is a figure who gets forgotten. But if you know all the stories coming in the future, we already can see stuff here, that gives impact. And if we only discussed it later on, we would forget this crucible, this beginning of the whole account. So, as I read on, it says, You shall call him Yishmael and God has paid heed to your suffering, he shall be a wild ass of a person, his hand against everyone and everyone’s hand against him. Here again, we see another motif where both Ishmael and ESAV they have the kind of skill set that you might need going forward in Jewish tradition going to the Shoftim (Judges) going forward in conquering the land, they are the people that have the skill set to conquer the land to make their way and, and in all of their cases, they have their supporters in this particular case we’ll see that Abraham really is consistent in his love and his dedication to Ishmael. In the case of Esau and Yaakov. Again, we have a Yaakov kind of likes Esau because he’s out there hunting and stuff. So this is another kind of theme that I want us all to keep in mind. It’s kind of like we’re repeating this story over and over again to learn something from it.

Adam Mintz  14:44

Good. I mean, that’s all good. The fact that the father seems to favor the son who loses. Now you could explain that that the father always favors the older son, but you could also explain it the way you just explained it Riskin always says it that way that no the father saw something in the older son that maybe the father lacked or maybe he saw that that would be important for the future. And therefore, he actually preferred that. Now the older son did not win. But the father saw something that was special in the older son.

Geoffrey Stern  15:16

Absolutely. So, here we are, and we are starting to see some patterns. And the patterns are fascinating, but the story moves on. And the story then goes to and God said to Abraham in Genesis 17:; 15, As for your wife Sarai, you shall not call her Sarai, but her name shall be Sarah. So changing Abraham’s name and Sarai name is almost like a rebirth. It’s שינוי שם משנה מזל and I will bless her indeed, and I will give her a son by her I will bless her that should give rise to nations rulers of people. Abraham threw himself on his face and laughed as he said to himself, can a child be born to a man 100 years old? Or can Sשרשי bear a child at 90? Verse 18. And Abraham said to God, Oh, that Ishmael might live by your favor. In the Hebrew it is ל֥וּ יִשְׁמָעֵ֖אל יִחְיֶ֥ה לְפָנֶֽיךָ. And the Ramban says its meaning is that he live and his seed shall always exist. So here, if you follow this interpretation, or even if you don’t, you would think that when the son from his wife is announced, his first thought would not be about his previous son, his son through his handmaid, so whether you give the Ramban’s interpretation or not, all of a sudden, Abraham consistently is thinking about Ishmael. But if you follow the Ramban, he’s saying, he wants to make sure that Ishmael is not displaced. I think that is fascinating. And then it goes on. And it continues in verse 20. And it says, as for Ishmael, God says, I have headed you, I hereby bless him, I will make him fertile and exceedingly numerous. He shall be the father of 12 chieftains, and I will make of him a great nation. But my covenant I will maintain with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this season next year, done speaking with him, God was gone from Abraham. So the meeting was over. But I had never realized Rabbi that God had promised Ishmael 12 tribes. I mean, in response to Abraham’s request, I just said never resonated to me. And it really does give power to these parallel stories and Abraham’s dual sense of love for his both his children.

Adam Mintz  18:29

Yeah, I mean, it’s really very powerful. And you know, it seems that Abraham… the second time, when he sends Hagar away with Yishmael that he sends them with that with a good knapsack full of stuff, which also is interesting.

Geoffrey Stern  18:44

Yeah. Okay. So so we get to the point now, that Yishmael is cast out. And at this point, we have a commentary like Rashi on 21: 10 says, the matter distressed Abraham greatly for it concerned a son of his וַיֵּ֧רַע הַדָּבָ֛ר מְאֹ֖ד בְּעֵינֵ֣י אַבְרָהָ֑ם עַ֖ל אוֹדֹ֥ת בְּנֽוֹ. And the story goes way beyond our parsha, and we can only be like a prequel to what happens. But to do that prequel what ultimately happens is that Hagar and Ishmael are cast out, Sarah again has an issue with them. In this case, she says that he is being Mitzachek… . He is fooling with Isaac. Some commentaries say that he was sexually perverse. Some say that he was making fun of him, which is the obvious explanation one modern day commentary says that he was Isaacing him …. he was trying to say that I am the firstborn. But whatever the case was, the concern of Sarah is I think I consistent that she wants to make sure that the covenant is with her son, Isaac. And the concern of Abraham is also consistent, that he is concerned about his other son, he loves him as well. And I think this is a powerful message. And, you know, I’ll go right to the end game rabbi, I’ve always been struck by the fact that on the first day of Rosh Hashanah, we read the story of Hagar and Ishmael being cast out being exiled. And on the second day, we read the story of the sacrifice of Isaac, and you know, there are all these modern day. Commentaries, I’d love to find out the original source of who decided what the Torah reading was for each day.

Adam Mintz  21:13

Goes back to the Talmud, it’s about 2000 years old.

Geoffrey Stern  21:17

I don’t know if the Talmud gives a reason. But at the end of the day, if you get rid of all the commentaries, you’re dedicating day one, to the narrative of Ishmael. And a two is the narrative of Isaac, I mean, that’s the long and the short of it. Or to put it slightly differently. You’re dedicating day one to the test of Abraham with Hagar and Ishmael, and day two to the test of Abraham with his son Isaac. Fascinating.

Adam Mintz  21:50

That is fascinating. And the lesson of the banishment of Ishmael is the opposite lesson as the Akedah right, so that’s interesting, all interesting.

Geoffrey Stern  22:04

So it is fascinating. So what I want to do is it’s fascinating where this story goes, in Genesis 25, and this is way beyond a today’s Pasha. It says that Sarah dies after the akedah, and that Abraham then marries a woman named Keturah. And the tradition is that that is Hagar. She was named Ketorah according to Rashi, because her deeds were as beautiful (sweet) as incense (Ketoreth) (Genesis Rabbah 61). One of the Midrashim says she was שֶׁמְקֻטֶּרֶת מִצְווֹת וּמַעֲשִׂים טוֹבִים full of mitzvot. And this takes on a whole new story in the later Pirkei D’Rav Eliezer and i enjoin you to all see the source notes on Sefira where I quote at length Pirkei D’Rab Eliezer which was written in the much later in the eight hundreds. That says that, basically what happened was that during Sarah’s life, Abraham had asked, could he go visit his son Ishmael. I mean, it almost sounds like after a divorce, where you asked your wife can I go visit my child from my previous marriage, and in Perkei D’Rav Eliezer 30 that he gets permission from Sarah to go visit is Ishmael as long as he doesn’t get off the camel, meaning to say I think that, you know, don’t stay there, don’t plant any seeds there. Make sure that you come back. And it’s a long story. And he goes to the wilderness of Paran. And he meets his wife. And he says, Where is Ishmael and Hagar and she says they’re out, you know, picking dates. And he says, Well, I’m a visitor, could you feed me? And she goes, I got no food. And to make a long story short, he says, could you give a message to smell and tell him that an old man came and that he should basically change the entrance to his house; his threshold. And according to Perkei D’Rav Natan Ishmael comes back and goes you know what happened? And she says this old man came and he asked about you and he told me to change the threshold of my house. And he understood, Ishmael understood that meant to change his wife, so he changes his wife. And again, Abraham comes back a while later. And this time the story repeats itself. And this time he says to the wife, do you have anything to feed me, and she feeds him as it happens, she feeds him and he tells her to tell Ishmael about this. And Ishmael is told that his threshold is good. And that’s the end of the story in Perkei D’Rav Natan. The amazing thing Rabbi that I discovered is that there is a Muslim version of this story. And the scholars all try, they’re crunching their heads, they’re, they’re there twiddling their beards to find out, which was the original story, and that interests me less. But in the Muslim version that is in the Sefira notes, it almost goes pretty much the same. In that version, Hagar is no longer alive, he comes to visit his son. And again, he tells her to change wives, they change wives. But the difference is that in the Muslim version, his feet are washed by her, they come to a place called Maquom. And then he helps him build a temple. And according to Muslim tradition, this is Abraham and Ishmael building the Kaaba in Mecca. And there is part of the Haj, the pilgrimage to Mecca, that involves ceremonies that kind of re-enact this whole episode. So, it is absolutely fascinating on a number of levels. Number one, since we are in the parsha which is about pilgrimage, we can’t but say that Haj is the same as the Hebrew word Hag, which is the word for three times a year of making the pilgrimage. So, we are united at that level. But to me, it is just fascinating that we share this story. And I think there are multiple places where Islam has either preserved Midrashim, or introduced Midrashim that were picked up by the rabbis. But it is it is absolutely fascinating how we share the story of a smell. Have you heard this before?

Adam Mintz  27:54

Yes, I have heard this before. The fact that there are shared traditions between the Jews and the Muslims is not surprising. You see, the Muslims believe that they are line when through Ishmael. So therefore, Ishmael needs to be the winner. Not Isaac, now the Torah has Isaac is the winner. But what the Muslim traditions stories have, they say even though Isaac was the winner, but he was only what appeared to be the winner. Everybody thought he was the winner. But actually quietly, what Abraham was doing was he was going out to the desert. And he was building Mecca, you know, the temple in Mecca. So, it’s really a very interesting thing. You know, how can you have Ishmael be the winner? When the Torah says that he’s not the winner? And the answer is that they have this this underlying current, which says that Abraham was more interested. Now, it’s not made up. And this is the point, Geoffrey that you made at the beginning. And that is, it’s not made up. Abraham likes Ishmael. He may even prefer Ishmael. So, the bottom line is that from the Torah, obviously, even though Abraham prefers Ishmael, but Isaac is the one who’s chosen Isaac is the one who has the Akeda, and all those kinds of things. But the idea that Abraham should prefer Ishmael, it’s not as if the Moslems were making things up out of thin air, there really was something that was substantial about all of this.

Geoffrey Stern  29:33

So we don’t have a lot of time. But let me move it to the third religion of Abraham, in Galatians, which is about Paul otherwise known as Saul, a student of Rabbi Gamliel… Paul says, and he’s talking to a bunch of Jews who want to keep this new version of Judaism for only the circumcised and they want to keep keeping the laws, and he brings up Ishmael and Isaac. And he says that, Isaac was the son of promise. Isaac was the promised child. And Ishmael was that natural child, we’ve heard that concept before. And he compares the Jews to the older son. By the way, when you hear the Pope or whatever, saying we love the Jewish people, they are older brothers, implicitly saying that we are the oldest sons, the older brothers we’re not chosen. But that’s another topic. But the fascinating thing is, and I don’t want to comment on Paul or the New Testament, and the whole concept of supersessionism, which is where they took over the covenant. But it is fascinating to me, that Paul does the obvious. He compares the Jews to the exiled Ishmael… he says that you got the Torah in Sinai in Arabia. And we have Midrashim that say we got the torah in neutral land outside of the land of Israel. It is fascinating that we, as the Jews could easily be compared to the rejected son, who happens to be the entitled son, who is rejected by our tradition. It’s a fantastic irony. And the one thing that comes to my mind is Paul talks about the first wife, and at this point, we should all be confused, because we don’t know for Abraham who the first wife or the first mother is, and last week’s parsha we had an amazing Haftorah which happened to be my Bar Mitzvah haftora and it talks about רׇנִּ֥י עֲקָרָ֖ה לֹ֣א יָלָ֑דָה, that the barren women shall rejoice because they are the blessed and at the end of the day rabbi, what we do find throughout all of Genesis is the miracle of birth. And that ultimately, is what we are celebrating here. Whether it’s the miracle of birth from someone barren, or a surrogate, we are all joined at the hip. And I just find that the story of Ishmael who ultimately was loved by the rabbi’s. We have rabbis called Rabbi Ishmael multiple Rabbis called Rabbi Ishmael we have no rabbis called Esau, you know, so, there is this love relationship and this kindred experience with Ishmael that I feel we cannot ignore and comes through loud and clear in this parsha and the narrative to follow.

Adam Mintz  33:16

Thank you so much Geoffrey. This is an amazing topic. It really there’s so much food for thought enjoy Lech Lecha everybody. And we look forward to seeing you next week. Shabbat shalom.

Geoffrey Stern  33:26

Shabbat Shalom to you all.

Sefaria Source Sheet: www.sefaria.org/sheets/442342

Listen to last year’s Lech Lecha Madlik Podcast: Abraham’s Epic Journey and Our Own

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized