Tag Archives: islam

Solaluna

parshat bo – exodus 12 – 13

This week on Madlik, we’re diving into a fascinating exploration of the Jewish calendar – a topic that’s not just about marking time, but about renewal, liberation, and the very essence of what it means to be Jewish. In our discussion of Parashat Bo, Geoffrey Stern and Rabbi Mintz unpack the significance of the first commandment given to the Israelites as a nation: establishing their own calendar. We examine how this seemingly simple act was actually a radical departure from other ancient calendars, and how it embodied core Jewish values of human agency and imperfection. Some highlights from our conversation:

– Why the lunar-solar Jewish calendar was seen as revolutionary by other cultures

– The deeper meaning behind witnessing the new moon

– How the Essenes and early Muslims viewed the Jewish calendar

– The beautiful tension between divine perfection and human imperfection in our timekeeping

This episode really drove home how our calendar reflects so much about our worldview as Jews. We hope it sparks some thoughtful reflection for you too. Tune in for a mind-expanding journey through time, Torah, and Jewish thought!

Sefaria Source Sheet: www.sefaria.org/sheets/620499

Transcript:

Welcome to Madlik.  My name is Geoffrey Stern and at Madlik we light a spark or shed some light on a Jewish Text or Tradition.  Along with Rabbi Adam Mintz we host Madlik Disruptive Torah on your favorite podcast platform and now on YouTube. This week’s Torah portion is Parshat Bo. According to Rabbinic tradition, the twelfth chapter of Exodus’ requirement that the Israelites take the lunar month of Aviv as the beginning of their calendrical year is the first commandment in this book of Laws. We consider the substance and ramifications of the unique Israelite and latter Jewish modified lunar calendar in the context of other alternatives and the Exodus story itself. So, join us for Solaluna.

more

Well, Rabbi, it is, I believe, Rosh Chodesh tomorrow. Correct. It’s Shvat, it’s Shvat is correct. And you are in Australia and I am in London. So the stars are aligned for us. The moon is about to start a new month. And here we are discussing what we have to realize is the first commandment of the Torah. So we’re starting fresh all over again. And because it’s something that has to do with time and the calendar, I thought I would remind myself and our listeners that if you look at the difference between Christianity and Judaism and Islam, I think the first thing they’ll say is the day of the Sabbath. Islam is on Friday. The Jews celebrate it on Saturday. Christians celebrate it on Sunday. One of the demarcation lines that religions make are always calandrical. And here we are. The first commandment has to do with much more than when we keep the Sabbath or the seventh day. It has to do with how we keep time, how we mark our calendars. And so in a sense, it’s surprising because it might seem to many of us as trivial. But on the other hand, it shouldn’t be surprising because Demarcating the calendar is something that historically has divided people. What thinks you?

Adam Mintz: Yeah, the calendar is the most important thing. That’s why it’s the first mitzvah, because you have nothing without the calendar. So we’re about to have Pesach. But Pesach isn’t worth anything unless you have a calendar to know when it falls and what the first month is. So this is. This is no question that this is the beginning. It’s not the beginning of the Torah. It’s the beginning of the story of the Jewish people.

Geoffrey Stern: And just to hammer the nail in. In my studies and preparation for today, I came across a Ketubah. You’re going to be marrying a couple on Friday in. In Australia. It’s a ketubah found in the geniza, and it’s a marriage between a karaite, those that kept, that followed the letter of the law, they were formalists or literalists and a Jewish fellow. And in the Ketubah, it has a condition, and it says that they will observe the holy festivals according to the sighting of the moon and the finding of the barley in the land of Israel, not according to the laws of the Gentiles. Already you see that the way you keep the calendar can divide people. I think of the Christian church, the Eastern Church and the Western church celebrate Christmas on different days. That totally divides them. So this is really a Rubicon, if you will. And therefore it shouldn’t surprise us, as you say, that it is the first law, but to remind us. So let’s start in Exodus.

Adam Mintz: Well, let’s go back for a second to the calendar. Why is it that in Russia they celebrate a different Christmas? You know, in 1582, Pope Gregory IX saw there was a problem with the calendar, and he eliminated 10 days from October 5th to October 15th. And the Russians, the Eastern Orthodox, never accepted it. So literally, it’s a different religion. Because if you don’t celebrate Christmas the same day, can you imagine if we celebrated Yom Kippur on one day and in Israel they celebrated Yom Kippur on another day? That would be crazy.

Geoffrey Stern: I mean, this.

Adam Mintz: We couldn’t have a religion that way.

Geoffrey Stern: It sets up the stakes of the discussion that we’re going to have. And as you know, there were instances in Judaism where different sages, maybe different communities had those notions and we could have gone down that path. Fortunately, we didn’t.

Adam Mintz: We avoided that path. Right.

Geoffrey Stern: So here we are in Exodus 12:1, and God said to Moses and to Aaron, in the land of Egypt, this month shall mark for you the Beginning of the months. It shall be the first of the months of the year for you. Chodesh hazeh lechem Rosh chadashim Rison hu l’chem L’hodshei Hasanah. So, Rashi, first of all, I go back to the first Rashi in all of the Bible. And Rashi asks the question, why do we have all this narrative of Abraham, of Adam and Eve, of the tower of Babel? He says, why don’t we start with the first commandment given to Israel, which is Hakodesh hazeh Lahem? It seems to be, while there may be disagreements when we count all of the 613 commandments which they are, there seems to be a consensus that this in fact is the first commandment given to the Jewish people.

Adam Mintz: Right. That. That’s correct. There are two things. One is, this is clearly the first commandment that’s given to the people. The people, not individuals. Not the Mitzvah of circumcision, not the mitzvah of Gid Hanasha. This is given to the people. But, you know, Rashi makes an interesting point in that first Rashi. He says, the Torah should have started with this chapter. You know, Geoffrey, that’s not so obvious. Who says that the Torah is only a book of law and that we should only have law in the Torah? I mean, I don’t know about you, but I’ve had a pretty good time with you since the week after Simcha’s Torah. You know, studying the stories. Isn’t that an important part of the Torah? So Rashi makes a huge jump by saying the Torah should start here.

Geoffrey Stern: Maybe I should rephrase, Rashi, because obviously he has an answer to that question. But I think if he were to say, if you think that the Torah is a book of law, then it should have started with this first commandment. Good, good. And then he answers, but it actually is more than a book of law.

Adam Mintz: good. Okay, good. That’s probably the right way to say it, because the other way to say it is, you know, that isn’t fair to the book of Bereshit.

Geoffrey Stern: But I love the fact that you reference circumcision and some other ordinances that were given to individuals like Abraham. That’s what one of some of the commentaries talk about in terms of speak unto Moses and to Aaron. This is a kind of a threshold. All of a sudden, God is not talking to Pharaoh. He’s talking to Moses and Aaron, and he’s commanding the people of Israel who were born. Moments, ago with the Exodus. From Egypt.

Adam Mintz: Right.

Geoffrey Stern: I just.

Adam Mintz: One little thing that’s related to all of this is last week we talked about the, the beginning of the plagues and, and, and Moses and Aaron. You know the Torah in last week’s Parasha, Someone pointed this out to me last Shabbat morning. The Torah in last. In last week’s Parasha says that the father of, of Moses and Aaron, Amram, married his aunt Yocheved. That’s what the Torah says in last week’s Parasha. Do you know that in the Torah later in, in, in Leviticus, the Torah says explicitly, you’re not allowed to marry your aunt? So Moses and Aaron come from an illicit marriage. I mean, nobody makes a big fuss about that. You have to say somehow, and this is your point, that what happens before chapter 12 is not really Torah in the legal sense. It’s stories, but it’s not really Torah. That’s super interesting.

Geoffrey Stern: Great. In any case, this is a pivotal moment. And the fact that the moment, the first commandment that was chosen was about this Rosh Chodesh, this beginning of the chodesh, we typically translate that to be month here or the next. Rashi. Rashi begins to get into a little bit of the nuance of the word for chodesh. He says that he showed him meaning Moses, the moon in the first stage of its renewal. And he goes, the tradition, therefore, is this stage of renewal shall be the moment of the beginning of the months. There’s something here about beginnings. There’s something here about this ability to renew oneself. And it all comes, it’s starting to color in and reflect this concept of not only is this something that relates only to the calendar, it might have something to do with the Exodus itself. And before you comment, I have to make one kind of admission that I was thinking this week to find a correlation between all the astrology that we came across in the book of Genesis and Exodus, which starts with the astrologers not being able to interpret Pharaoh’s dream of seven good years and bad years. And all of a sudden Joseph coming and doing that the astrologers couldn’t do. And then we have the astrologers who are trying to mimic the plagues and the tricks, so to speak, of Moses. And then we have the astrologers who predict the birth of the savior of the Jews, Moses, and therefore determine that all the firstborn should be killed. I was trying to see kind of a contrast, a departure here, that the Jews were, in a sense, rejecting a little bit of the set rules of astrology and Looking at the moon, didn’t find anything. I’m curious to know what you’re thinking.

Adam Mintz: I mean, I think that’s very good. It seems to be, from the way the Torah presents it, as if this is a big innovation, right? The Torah presents it like, wow, we’re going to declare the month based on the moon and our whole calendar is going to be based on the moon. That seems to be a big deal. Doesn’t.

Geoffrey Stern: Certainly does. There is this sense of renewal, There is this sense of something fresh. There is this correlation that the first Rashi in Genesis kind of triggers, which that was the creation. And this is the creation. This is the beginning of this amazing journey. And Cassuto, who I just love that Sefaria has used him. I do have to provide my own translation.

Adam Mintz: I was going to say, I’m surprised they translated. That’s great that you translated.

Geoffrey Stern: So he’s lyrical. What he says is. And he follows a little bit on the higher biblical critics who make a distinction between the few verses that we just read, a whole bunch of body that lies in between, which talks about the Exodus, the passover of the Exodus, and then goes back to the Exodus of the generations. What we just heard a second ago, Rabbi, was not only for the people of the Exodus, the moment in Egypt when the slaves were freed, it was forever. And what he says is, this is a momentous change in paradigm. He says, after the end of the previous episode comes a break. And after the pause, as mentioned in the description of events change, the story takes on a new form. Pharaoh is forgotten, his servants are forgotten. Pharaoh’s palace and the entire environment where which we stood during the entire previous episode seem to have disappeared before our eyes. The center of the plot is now in the midst of the people of Israel. And the commands given to Moses and Aaron are directed towards the people of Israel. This is people pointed. And whatever needs to be done towards Pharaoh, God’s going to take care of it. They, Moses and Aaron have nothing but to take care of their people. And the first command given to them is the command to prepare for the day of the redemption, which will come soon on the one of the first months of the year. This is the beginning of a new period in people’s lives. So he really is almost leaving.

Adam Mintz: This is a remarkable Cassuto.

Geoffrey Stern: It’s poetic. I never saw him to be so poetic, but really, really great. It’s a new chapter. It’s a mind change all of a sudden. So what happens is after we skip the in between verses that talk about the exact requirements for that particular passover, the passover of those people who were being redeemed. It comes back to the Yetziat Mitzrayim. shel hadorot wrote, Moses said to the people in verse 13:3, remember this day in mind on which you went out from Egypt from the house of serfs, for by the strength of God brought you out from here. No, Chametz, no fermentation is to be eaten. He says, today you are going out in the month of Aviv, which Fox correctly translates as not spring, but a particular aspect of spring. This grain, this first grain to blossom. And what’s important here is that all of a sudden, Hayoma tem yotzim bechodesh Aviva, before it said, you have to keep this month, and this is the month of the Exodus. Now you have to follow the Chodesh, the lunar calendar. Now it adds something more. And now it says, but even though you follow the lunar calendar, it has to be linked to the time when the barley blossoms. And this, Rabbi, is where things start to get complicated. Because up until this point, we could have easily said we were going to have a lunar calendar. But guess what? Lunar calendars need to be corrected. Because if, as Islam, as we’ll see in a second, you have a strictly lunar calendar, Ramadan can happen any month of the year. If you have a solar calendar, Christmas is always going to be December 25th. If you have a lunar calendar, we get into the old question of are the holidays early this year or are they late this year? It has to be fixed.

Adam Mintz: So let me just say that the Chodesh Aviv introduces. Of course, you’re right, and that’s going to be fascinating about the calendar, but it introduces the agricultural feature means, you know, the. The idea that we left Egypt during the spring somehow was important as we go forward in terms of the agricultural connection.

Geoffrey Stern: Absolutely. And of course, in prior years, when we’ve looked at the kibbutzim haggadot, they really emphasize the spring, seasonable and agricultural part of this. But here I had never realized that Aviv doesn’t really mean spring. It’s so linked to agriculture. It has to do with the first blossoming of barley.

Adam Mintz: And I think that’s in the Torah. The fact that the word Aviv means that I think is from the Torah somewhere. So that point is really good. By Fox.

Geoffrey Stern: Absolutely. And so one of the things that Rashi brings that is linked to this is that this is not a coincidence. The idea in the rabbinic texts is She hu Kashar l’tzeit that this time of spring is actually connected. It is fitted for this redemption. So, again, along with Cassuto and along with what Rashi said earlier about seeing it, not necessarily seeing the moon, but seeing the renewal of the moon, everything here is about renewal. It’s starting to fill in the blanks quite nicely.

Adam Mintz: Fantastic. I just want to say you need that, Rashi, because otherwise it seems kind of random that you have to go out in the spring. Why don’t we have a calendar like the Muslims? So Rashi is kind of sensitive to that.

Geoffrey Stern: Yes. Yeah, absolutely. And just to give you. And again, I always say this when we do our podcasts, there are. Sefaria notes that go along with our podcast that have all these texts in full length. We just quote a little bit from them. So the Rabbeinu Bachaya actually says something that’s fascinating for our liturgy. And he says that the blessing that we say is Mekadesh Yisrael VeHazmanim, we bless Israel and its timing v’lo haMoadim and not the festivals. In other words, what takes precedent is you can’t have Passover without the season of the spring. You can’t have Sukkot without the season of the harvest. It’s the season that comes first. It’s the calendar that comes first. I would venture to say that in the eyes of the rabbis, in the eyes of the text itself, what we’re seeing is the radicalization of this lunar calendar that’s being introduced here. It really is packed and pregnant with meaning about renewal, about seasons, about the change of history, if you will.

Adam Mintz: Yeah, no, I mean, that’s really good. Let’s just think about that for a minute. I never thought about it, but Mikadesh Yisrael v’hazmanim That’s not really correct because we say Mikadesh Hashabbat. It should be Mikadesh Yisrael V’hamoadim ha’moadot So hazmanim the importance of time. That’s a very, very good point by Rabenu Bachaya. I like it.

Geoffrey Stern: Yeah, yeah, fascinating. But it’s even more fascinating in the context of the discussion that we’re having, because we’re talking about time and we’re talking about calandrical time. So, of course, the cornerstone of the last verse that we need is in Leviticus, where it says, Elu Moadei hashem. These are the set times of God, the sacred occasions where you shall celebrate at its appointed time. So if there was ever any question that this lunar calendar had to be calibrated so that even though it misses 10 days every year, it will be calibrated. So Passover is always in the spring. This is explicit requirement that our calendar calibrates itself. And of course, we had some of this when we were looking at Genesis. In Genesis 1, we actually mentioned this where it says, God said, let there be light in the expanse of the sky to separate day from night. They shall serve as signs for the set times, the days and the years. It was clear that the sun and the moon, both of them, were going to be used in calibrating holidays and serving as signs for mankind to kind of go through the cycle of life.

Adam Mintz: Just take one second on that. And that is that you see that this idea of the moon and the holiday days goes back to breishit, goes back to creation. You know, that’s a little trick that the Torah plays, and that is that everything is found in creation. God doesn’t change things. God just allow, you know, kind of pulled out from creation at different points in history. The Mishnah in Pirkeo Avot talks about the talk. This is out. Out of context a little bit, but he talked about the. The talking donkey. Like, where’s the talking donkey? We never had a talking donkey. He says that also was created at the time of creation, and God kind of pulled it out of creation. So here too, Genesis 1:14, and now finally in chapter 12, God takes it out. That’s very good.

Geoffrey Stern: Look, it’s a general statement. It was the world that people lived in. They didn’t take out their calendar, they didn’t look on their watch. It was derived from nature, from the stars. And so I think even at the most basic level, what it’s saying is ancient man, but the Jews were no exception. Looked up to the stars, looked up to the moon. I mean, I think the word for month is chodesh, which definitely comes from renewal, which the scholars argue argues against a solar system where you don’t really have renewal, you have cyclicality. And then the other word for month is yerech. Yerech means moon. So you can make a compelling case that the core of the Israelite calendar was the moon. But nonetheless, we’re going to see that the sun enters into it. So I think what we need to share now is what is absolutely unique about the way the Jews counted the months. And we noticed a little bit before that some of the commentaries focus on the fact that when in our Parasha, God said to Moses, it’s the new moon, he said Hazeh, he was like pointing to the moon. And the way our tradition took that is, that the new moon is something not to be calculated, but is to be seen by witnesses. Witnesses were to go out. I would argue that this is the humanizing of the calendar, that the calendar was dependent on society and members of the society. But the way the rabbis took that really made that concept that I just said on steroids. Because what they said was, is even if you have a witness who comes in. And in the case of the Talmud, in Rosh Hashanah, where witnesses come in and they say, we saw the moon at its earliest phase on Monday, and then on Tuesday, they come in and say, we didn’t see it today in the same phase. And what the Talmud says is. What they’re saying is scientifically unacceptable. And so these witnesses should be rejected. The example they give is to say about a woman that she gave birth on Monday, and then you look at her and her belly is between her teeth. On Tuesday, it’s clear that she’s still pregnant. And what Rabban Gamliel did, and he was the Nasi, he was in charge, he says, we don’t follow science in this regard. We’re not that interested. In fact, we’re much more interested in the process. And so he said, the new moon will be when these witnesses determined it would be. And Rabbi Joshua came and argued with him. And the famous story is that he told Rabbi Joshua, I want you to come to me on the day according to which you believe Yom Kippur is. And I want you to have your staff in hand, which is not permitted on Yom Kippur. I want you to walk to me and desecrate what you believe to be Yom Kippur. And the idea is that it was more important, this process of man and society seeing when they believed the moon was in its phase than what was in reality. And what Rabbi Akiva did to calm down this Rabbi Joshua is literally talk about this verse from Leviticus that we just mentioned. And he says, these are the appointed seasons of the Lord. He says, whether they are declared them or not at the right time is not important. It’s when they are appointed. And I think this is one of the radical aspects of the way that Jewish and rabbinic tradition took this concept of declaring the new moon.

Adam Mintz: Yeah. Now let me ask you a question. Why do you think you did a very good job in summarizing that story about Yom Kippur? Why do you think there’s a need for that story about Yom Kippur?

Geoffrey Stern: Because I think what we’re going to see is that the alternatives to the Israelite calendar were calendars that were trying to be perfect. We are going to see and we might as well move to this right away. In the Dead Sea Scrolls they found something called the Book of Jubilees. And of course, Jubilees we know, is something that’s calendrical. It has to do with the calendar. And it’s clear that there was at least part of the sect and part of the reason the Essenes broke away from Rabbinic Jews is they believed that the year was 364 days. Interesting. Not 365. 364. And they say that the reason that that is so important, in other words, a solar year is so important, is that everything will fall in according to the way it’s supposed to be. And they looked at the rabbis and a story like the one we just heard and they said they are disturbing the feasts. They went on to say, for I know for henceforth shall declare it unto them is not of my own devising. In other words, we can’t make up a calendar. We can’t decide when a month begins. For the book that is written before me is on the heavenly tables. The divisions of days is ordained. And what they are saying is that any calendar that can be adjusted by man, and I think that we saw in that story of Rabbi Akiva and Joshua, cannot be pure, cannot be holy, cannot survive within a religious context. And I’ll quote one of the scholars who talks about it, is they were looking at time in heaven is precise and unchanging, a heavenly based system. And it’s interesting, Rabbi, why they wanted 364, because 364 is actually divisible so that every date in the calendar is therefore can be assigned a specific day. 91, 13 weeks of seven days. It all was perfect.

Adam Mintz: Now, you know that, Geoffrey, right? You know that from your birthday. If your birthday this year is on a Monday, next year it’s going to be on a Tuesday. It’s one day off. I just want to say one thing, and that is we’re coming to the end. So before you finish this up, I just want to say one thing. And that is, of course, the argument between the rabbis and the Essenes and the book of Jubilees is whether or not the calendar should be man made or God made. We believe that man, that the Oral Torah is man’s contribution. That’s why the calendar is so important, because it’s man’s contribution. But they didn’t believe that. They wanted everything to come from God.

Geoffrey Stern: And to show you that this was not me in 2025, presupposing what other people thought of the Jewish calendar, the Islamic calendar goes in the opposite direction. It follows a purely, and I emphasize the word pure, purely lunar calendar. And they say a calendar that can be adjusted to address the marketing season, to address the harvesting season. They call it Al Nasi. And most scholars believe that al nasi is literally referring to the rabbinic calendar where the nasi determined. So I think what you have to understand is the Jewish calendar was redical,, but it was radical and self understood to be radical. Radical and understood by its neighboring religions and cultures to be radical. And at the end of the day, I think we live in a society where people believe they have facts and they dive into their facts. And anyone who believes in their facts are correct and anyone else is a heretic, is a liar, is a criminal. And I think that’s how you could look at perfect calendars, whether it’s lunar or solar. And I think what the radical context of what the Israelite and later Jewish calendar was saying was just calm down. We can have a calendar that is imperfect because humanity is imperfect. And dare I say the world is imperfect. We might not understand our God created world as being imperfect, but it is so. And that the importance of the message for liberation is that society. And that’s why this Cassuto was so beautiful when he says we are switching gears here and now we’re talking about not miracles and not politics. We’re talking about society and the calendar and the time that they will make work. And I think it’s a radical message.

Adam Mintz: It’s great. This is amazing. I’m going to share it this week in Melbourne at the shul. This is a great message about the calendar, about what the Torah comes to say. Fantastic. Shabbat Shalom, everybody. This was really, really good this week. Next week we’ll both be back on the east coast in New York. Kind of boring, but we will continue learning Parshat B’shalach. Be well, everybody.

Geoffrey Stern: Shabbat Shalom.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Call me Ishmael

parshat lech lecha, genesis 16 – 25

Join Geoffrey Stern and Rabbi Adam Mintz recorded on Clubhouse on November 3rd 2022. We discover that when the younger son Isaac is chosen, the older son Ishmael’s banishment in some way endears him to his father and latter Rabbinic and Muslim commentators. By being rejected Ishmael may actually provide an alter ego of the Jewish people. We will discuss…

Sefaria Source sheet: www.sefaria.org/sheets/442342

Transcript:

Welcome to Madlik.  My name is Geoffrey Stern and at Madlik we light a spark or shed some light on a Jewish Text or Tradition.  Along with Rabbi Adam Mintz, we host Madlik Disruptive Torah on clubhouse every Thursday at 8:00pm Eastern and share it as the Madlik podcast on your favorite platform. This week’s Torah portion is Lech Lecha, normally associated with the birth of the Jewish people.  Reading it afresh this year we discover that when the younger son Isaac is chosen, it is at the expense of the older son Ishmael’s banishment.  We explore how Ishmael’s role as the outcast in some way endears him to his father and latter Rabbinic and Muslim commentators. By being rejected Ishmael may actually provide an alter ego and narrative to the Jewish people. So with apologies to Herman Melville, join us for Call Me Ishmael.

more

So yeah, we’re going back to Moby Dick. It feels like we’re back in high school. For those of you who have forgotten your high school class in literature, it is the first three words of Moby Dick. And he Ishmael is the narrator of the whole story. And he kind of disappears. He’s characterized as someone with little or no money in his purse, nothing to do. He says, If I stay here any longer, I’m gonna start hitting people. So that’s when I take to the sea. So he’s kind of a wanderer. And maybe that’s why Melville called them Ishmael. But more important to us, he kind of disappears in the narrative until the end when he’s the only survivor. So normally, as I said, in the intro, when we read Lech Lecha, we are focused on the birth of the Jewish people on the amazing narrative, of Avram and Sarai leaving their homeland and going on this amazing journey and pilgrimage. But along the way, we get this breadth of Ishmael this other character, who, like Ishmael in Moby Dick appears, and then seemingly kind of a disappears. So, I think I’d like to introduce this whole episode, because we are talking about Isaac and Ishmael, the two sons of Abraham, with a quote from Robert Alter, the great modern commentary as literature on the Bible. And he says the entire Book of Genesis is about the reversal of the iron law of primogeniture, about the election through some devious twist of destiny of a youngest son to carry on the line. So, if last week, we talked about the flip side of choosing a Noah choosing an Abraham was regretting another choice. Today, we’re going to talk about if the narrative of all of Genesis is choosing, not the firstborn son, the second born son, and then the flip side of that is the rejection of the firstborn son. Or to put it in a more ironic way. If primogeniture is a sense of entitlement of the first born, the Bible systemically rejects the first boy. So it’s the rejection of the entitled, if you will. And that’s kind of an interesting way to look at the, the dynamics of not only Ishmael and Isaac, but Esau and Yaakov. What do you think, Rabbi?

Adam Mintz  04:05

I mean, that is the story. Actually, last week, we were given a little glimpse of that, because the story of Noah getting drunk after the flood, there was Shem, Ham and Yefet, and the one who’s really chosen is sham, who turns out to be the youngest son. So, we get that a little bit there. But here for the first time, we get the idea that Abraham has two sons, Ishmael should have been the chosen son. He was born, you know, Sarah suggested that he bear a child with Hagar with the maidservant. And he was born and he should have been the one and there should not have been any story. But Sarah gets jealous and God tells Abraham to listen to Sarah. So, the story is the fact that the older one is put aside for the younger one. And the famous introduction to the story of the binding of Isaac tells us that God says to Abraham, take your son, your favorite son, the son that you like more than anybody else. And Rashi says, why does he have to say so many things just take, say, your son, take your son, there’s no reason to take your son. He says, I have two sons. Take your son you love. He says, I have two sons that I love. Take the son that she only wanted. Well, I have two sons, the only one so they’re two. They’re one mother. And so therefore, Abraham wasn’t so sure which son it was. God had to tell him which son it was,

Geoffrey Stern  05:33

Man, you hit the nail on the head, right There’s no question about it. I think to me, what’s intriguing is when you systemically, reject the firstborn, and you pick what you normally call the runt of the litter, then the first port becomes the rejected. And that’s kind of what’s fascinating here. And it’s fascinating, as you say, when in that episode, where God says, pick your son, Abraham keeps going back to his quote, unquote, rejected son, who is the first born. So here we go. We are in Genesis 16. And Sarai, Abraham’s wife had bought him no children, and she had an Egyptian maid servant whose name was Hagar. And so, I said to Abram, look, God has kept me from bearing. Consort with my maid, perhaps I shall have a child through her. And Abraham headed Saria’s request. So, I Abam’s wife took her maid Hagar the Egyptian, after Abraham had dwelt in the land of Canaan 10 years, and gave her to her husband Abraham as a concubine. I just want to note that the Hebrew here is וַתִּתֵּ֥ן אֹתָ֛הּ לְאַבְרָ֥ם אִישָׁ֖הּ ל֥וֹ לְאִשָּֽׁה. So even though the translation is a concubine, I think Rabbi you’ll agree with me אִישָׁ֖הּ ל֥וֹ לְאִשָּֽׁה  is as a wife, in a sense. So, then it goes on. And he says, And he cohabitated with Hagar, and she conceived, and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was lowered and her esteem. So here if you give me a little literary license, either Hagar God looked down upon Sarai, because actually, she had delivered and Sarai was barren, or Sarai is somehow projecting on to what Hagar must be thinking, because then it says in verse five, and Sarai said to Abram, the one done to me is your fault. She blames it on Abram, I, myself, put my maid in your bosom now that she sees that she is pregnant, and I am lowered in her esteem, God decide between you and me, Abram said to Sarai your maid is in your hands deal with her as you think right, then, so Sarai treated her harshly, and she ran away from her. So there is a lot of focus later, when Ishmael is actually born, that he misbehaves, and he is thrown out of the house, but tellingly, even here, before he is born, Sarai sees a reflection in her Hagar’s attitude, and already acts in such a manner that Hagar ran away? That is pretty profound, don’t you think?

Adam Mintz  08:54

It is pretty profound, you know, think about what it means to run away. Here’s a maid servant. She’s has nothing. She comes from Egypt. She’s living in the home, let’s say of a successful man, you know, in Canaan, if she runs away, she’s nothing. Can you imagine, people lead like an au pair, who comes from a foreign country running away from the family that she’s working for? They’re helpless. So it’s a big deal that she runs away. It must have been pretty horrible.

Geoffrey Stern  09:24

So runaway is one way to look at it. But if the circumstances were such as though she had no choice, in a sense, she was exiled. She was pushed out and remember as a Jew, reading the Bible, I have a certain sensitivity to people who are exiled. So that becomes a fascinating double entendre here, and then it goes on … and remember, Ishmael is not born yet. A messenger of God found her by a Spring of water in the wilderness the spring on the road to Shur, (8) and said, “Hagar, slave of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?” And she says, I’m running from my mistress. And he says, Go back to your mistress submit to her harsh treatment. And then the messenger of God says in verse 10, I will greatly increase your offspring, and they shall be too many to count, the Messenger of God said to her further, behold, you are pregnant and shall bear a son, you shall call him Ishmael.  So, it’s almost a parallel story of a latest story that we will read, where a Sarah actually rejects and throws out Hagar. she also comes to a spring of water. And she also is given a blessing. This is almost like practice, like when children watch the scary movie over and over again, so that they can wrap their arms around it, but already, you get a sense of there is this respect, and this sensitivity, and this simpatico with Ishmael. The Rabbis said that there were only a few people who were named before they were born. And Ishmael is one. So here you shall call him Ishmael… he’s in a select few of people. As much as we know the later story just forgets about Ishmael. At this point. You could almost say to me, I don’t know where this story is going. I don’t know who’s going to be the hero.

Adam Mintz  11:49

Yeah, I mean, that’s good. Let me just to go back to just said somebody good things here. The fact that the story in this week’s power shot and next week’s PowerShell are basically you know, the same story. There’s only one difference in this week’s parsha Hagar gets banished in next week’s Parasha she doesn’t like Ishmael, Ishmael is a bad influence on her son. So, what happens to Hagar in both the cases is the same. But Sarah’s view is different. In this week’s parsha, you have this funny thing she’s competitive, you have to understand that right? He’s taking another wife. Not really, because clearly they had this idea of maidservants. But Sarah get’s jealous. Next week, she’s worried about the kid. And he’s a bad influence, the older son, which we can understand right… the teenage brother who gets the younger brother in trouble?

Geoffrey Stern  12:45

Absolutely. You know, normally, when we discuss a parsha, we don’t talk about what happens at toward the end. But I think that’s why my comment about Moby Dick and Melville is so important that Ismael is a figure who gets forgotten. But if you know all the stories coming in the future, we already can see stuff here, that gives impact. And if we only discussed it later on, we would forget this crucible, this beginning of the whole account. So, as I read on, it says, You shall call him Yishmael and God has paid heed to your suffering, he shall be a wild ass of a person, his hand against everyone and everyone’s hand against him. Here again, we see another motif where both Ishmael and ESAV they have the kind of skill set that you might need going forward in Jewish tradition going to the Shoftim (Judges) going forward in conquering the land, they are the people that have the skill set to conquer the land to make their way and, and in all of their cases, they have their supporters in this particular case we’ll see that Abraham really is consistent in his love and his dedication to Ishmael. In the case of Esau and Yaakov. Again, we have a Yaakov kind of likes Esau because he’s out there hunting and stuff. So this is another kind of theme that I want us all to keep in mind. It’s kind of like we’re repeating this story over and over again to learn something from it.

Adam Mintz  14:44

Good. I mean, that’s all good. The fact that the father seems to favor the son who loses. Now you could explain that that the father always favors the older son, but you could also explain it the way you just explained it Riskin always says it that way that no the father saw something in the older son that maybe the father lacked or maybe he saw that that would be important for the future. And therefore, he actually preferred that. Now the older son did not win. But the father saw something that was special in the older son.

Geoffrey Stern  15:16

Absolutely. So, here we are, and we are starting to see some patterns. And the patterns are fascinating, but the story moves on. And the story then goes to and God said to Abraham in Genesis 17:; 15, As for your wife Sarai, you shall not call her Sarai, but her name shall be Sarah. So changing Abraham’s name and Sarai name is almost like a rebirth. It’s שינוי שם משנה מזל and I will bless her indeed, and I will give her a son by her I will bless her that should give rise to nations rulers of people. Abraham threw himself on his face and laughed as he said to himself, can a child be born to a man 100 years old? Or can Sשרשי bear a child at 90? Verse 18. And Abraham said to God, Oh, that Ishmael might live by your favor. In the Hebrew it is ל֥וּ יִשְׁמָעֵ֖אל יִחְיֶ֥ה לְפָנֶֽיךָ. And the Ramban says its meaning is that he live and his seed shall always exist. So here, if you follow this interpretation, or even if you don’t, you would think that when the son from his wife is announced, his first thought would not be about his previous son, his son through his handmaid, so whether you give the Ramban’s interpretation or not, all of a sudden, Abraham consistently is thinking about Ishmael. But if you follow the Ramban, he’s saying, he wants to make sure that Ishmael is not displaced. I think that is fascinating. And then it goes on. And it continues in verse 20. And it says, as for Ishmael, God says, I have headed you, I hereby bless him, I will make him fertile and exceedingly numerous. He shall be the father of 12 chieftains, and I will make of him a great nation. But my covenant I will maintain with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this season next year, done speaking with him, God was gone from Abraham. So the meeting was over. But I had never realized Rabbi that God had promised Ishmael 12 tribes. I mean, in response to Abraham’s request, I just said never resonated to me. And it really does give power to these parallel stories and Abraham’s dual sense of love for his both his children.

Adam Mintz  18:29

Yeah, I mean, it’s really very powerful. And you know, it seems that Abraham… the second time, when he sends Hagar away with Yishmael that he sends them with that with a good knapsack full of stuff, which also is interesting.

Geoffrey Stern  18:44

Yeah. Okay. So so we get to the point now, that Yishmael is cast out. And at this point, we have a commentary like Rashi on 21: 10 says, the matter distressed Abraham greatly for it concerned a son of his וַיֵּ֧רַע הַדָּבָ֛ר מְאֹ֖ד בְּעֵינֵ֣י אַבְרָהָ֑ם עַ֖ל אוֹדֹ֥ת בְּנֽוֹ. And the story goes way beyond our parsha, and we can only be like a prequel to what happens. But to do that prequel what ultimately happens is that Hagar and Ishmael are cast out, Sarah again has an issue with them. In this case, she says that he is being Mitzachek… . He is fooling with Isaac. Some commentaries say that he was sexually perverse. Some say that he was making fun of him, which is the obvious explanation one modern day commentary says that he was Isaacing him …. he was trying to say that I am the firstborn. But whatever the case was, the concern of Sarah is I think I consistent that she wants to make sure that the covenant is with her son, Isaac. And the concern of Abraham is also consistent, that he is concerned about his other son, he loves him as well. And I think this is a powerful message. And, you know, I’ll go right to the end game rabbi, I’ve always been struck by the fact that on the first day of Rosh Hashanah, we read the story of Hagar and Ishmael being cast out being exiled. And on the second day, we read the story of the sacrifice of Isaac, and you know, there are all these modern day. Commentaries, I’d love to find out the original source of who decided what the Torah reading was for each day.

Adam Mintz  21:13

Goes back to the Talmud, it’s about 2000 years old.

Geoffrey Stern  21:17

I don’t know if the Talmud gives a reason. But at the end of the day, if you get rid of all the commentaries, you’re dedicating day one, to the narrative of Ishmael. And a two is the narrative of Isaac, I mean, that’s the long and the short of it. Or to put it slightly differently. You’re dedicating day one to the test of Abraham with Hagar and Ishmael, and day two to the test of Abraham with his son Isaac. Fascinating.

Adam Mintz  21:50

That is fascinating. And the lesson of the banishment of Ishmael is the opposite lesson as the Akedah right, so that’s interesting, all interesting.

Geoffrey Stern  22:04

So it is fascinating. So what I want to do is it’s fascinating where this story goes, in Genesis 25, and this is way beyond a today’s Pasha. It says that Sarah dies after the akedah, and that Abraham then marries a woman named Keturah. And the tradition is that that is Hagar. She was named Ketorah according to Rashi, because her deeds were as beautiful (sweet) as incense (Ketoreth) (Genesis Rabbah 61). One of the Midrashim says she was שֶׁמְקֻטֶּרֶת מִצְווֹת וּמַעֲשִׂים טוֹבִים full of mitzvot. And this takes on a whole new story in the later Pirkei D’Rav Eliezer and i enjoin you to all see the source notes on Sefira where I quote at length Pirkei D’Rab Eliezer which was written in the much later in the eight hundreds. That says that, basically what happened was that during Sarah’s life, Abraham had asked, could he go visit his son Ishmael. I mean, it almost sounds like after a divorce, where you asked your wife can I go visit my child from my previous marriage, and in Perkei D’Rav Eliezer 30 that he gets permission from Sarah to go visit is Ishmael as long as he doesn’t get off the camel, meaning to say I think that, you know, don’t stay there, don’t plant any seeds there. Make sure that you come back. And it’s a long story. And he goes to the wilderness of Paran. And he meets his wife. And he says, Where is Ishmael and Hagar and she says they’re out, you know, picking dates. And he says, Well, I’m a visitor, could you feed me? And she goes, I got no food. And to make a long story short, he says, could you give a message to smell and tell him that an old man came and that he should basically change the entrance to his house; his threshold. And according to Perkei D’Rav Natan Ishmael comes back and goes you know what happened? And she says this old man came and he asked about you and he told me to change the threshold of my house. And he understood, Ishmael understood that meant to change his wife, so he changes his wife. And again, Abraham comes back a while later. And this time the story repeats itself. And this time he says to the wife, do you have anything to feed me, and she feeds him as it happens, she feeds him and he tells her to tell Ishmael about this. And Ishmael is told that his threshold is good. And that’s the end of the story in Perkei D’Rav Natan. The amazing thing Rabbi that I discovered is that there is a Muslim version of this story. And the scholars all try, they’re crunching their heads, they’re, they’re there twiddling their beards to find out, which was the original story, and that interests me less. But in the Muslim version that is in the Sefira notes, it almost goes pretty much the same. In that version, Hagar is no longer alive, he comes to visit his son. And again, he tells her to change wives, they change wives. But the difference is that in the Muslim version, his feet are washed by her, they come to a place called Maquom. And then he helps him build a temple. And according to Muslim tradition, this is Abraham and Ishmael building the Kaaba in Mecca. And there is part of the Haj, the pilgrimage to Mecca, that involves ceremonies that kind of re-enact this whole episode. So, it is absolutely fascinating on a number of levels. Number one, since we are in the parsha which is about pilgrimage, we can’t but say that Haj is the same as the Hebrew word Hag, which is the word for three times a year of making the pilgrimage. So, we are united at that level. But to me, it is just fascinating that we share this story. And I think there are multiple places where Islam has either preserved Midrashim, or introduced Midrashim that were picked up by the rabbis. But it is it is absolutely fascinating how we share the story of a smell. Have you heard this before?

Adam Mintz  27:54

Yes, I have heard this before. The fact that there are shared traditions between the Jews and the Muslims is not surprising. You see, the Muslims believe that they are line when through Ishmael. So therefore, Ishmael needs to be the winner. Not Isaac, now the Torah has Isaac is the winner. But what the Muslim traditions stories have, they say even though Isaac was the winner, but he was only what appeared to be the winner. Everybody thought he was the winner. But actually quietly, what Abraham was doing was he was going out to the desert. And he was building Mecca, you know, the temple in Mecca. So, it’s really a very interesting thing. You know, how can you have Ishmael be the winner? When the Torah says that he’s not the winner? And the answer is that they have this this underlying current, which says that Abraham was more interested. Now, it’s not made up. And this is the point, Geoffrey that you made at the beginning. And that is, it’s not made up. Abraham likes Ishmael. He may even prefer Ishmael. So, the bottom line is that from the Torah, obviously, even though Abraham prefers Ishmael, but Isaac is the one who’s chosen Isaac is the one who has the Akeda, and all those kinds of things. But the idea that Abraham should prefer Ishmael, it’s not as if the Moslems were making things up out of thin air, there really was something that was substantial about all of this.

Geoffrey Stern  29:33

So we don’t have a lot of time. But let me move it to the third religion of Abraham, in Galatians, which is about Paul otherwise known as Saul, a student of Rabbi Gamliel… Paul says, and he’s talking to a bunch of Jews who want to keep this new version of Judaism for only the circumcised and they want to keep keeping the laws, and he brings up Ishmael and Isaac. And he says that, Isaac was the son of promise. Isaac was the promised child. And Ishmael was that natural child, we’ve heard that concept before. And he compares the Jews to the older son. By the way, when you hear the Pope or whatever, saying we love the Jewish people, they are older brothers, implicitly saying that we are the oldest sons, the older brothers we’re not chosen. But that’s another topic. But the fascinating thing is, and I don’t want to comment on Paul or the New Testament, and the whole concept of supersessionism, which is where they took over the covenant. But it is fascinating to me, that Paul does the obvious. He compares the Jews to the exiled Ishmael… he says that you got the Torah in Sinai in Arabia. And we have Midrashim that say we got the torah in neutral land outside of the land of Israel. It is fascinating that we, as the Jews could easily be compared to the rejected son, who happens to be the entitled son, who is rejected by our tradition. It’s a fantastic irony. And the one thing that comes to my mind is Paul talks about the first wife, and at this point, we should all be confused, because we don’t know for Abraham who the first wife or the first mother is, and last week’s parsha we had an amazing Haftorah which happened to be my Bar Mitzvah haftora and it talks about רׇנִּ֥י עֲקָרָ֖ה לֹ֣א יָלָ֑דָה, that the barren women shall rejoice because they are the blessed and at the end of the day rabbi, what we do find throughout all of Genesis is the miracle of birth. And that ultimately, is what we are celebrating here. Whether it’s the miracle of birth from someone barren, or a surrogate, we are all joined at the hip. And I just find that the story of Ishmael who ultimately was loved by the rabbi’s. We have rabbis called Rabbi Ishmael multiple Rabbis called Rabbi Ishmael we have no rabbis called Esau, you know, so, there is this love relationship and this kindred experience with Ishmael that I feel we cannot ignore and comes through loud and clear in this parsha and the narrative to follow.

Adam Mintz  33:16

Thank you so much Geoffrey. This is an amazing topic. It really there’s so much food for thought enjoy Lech Lecha everybody. And we look forward to seeing you next week. Shabbat shalom.

Geoffrey Stern  33:26

Shabbat Shalom to you all.

Sefaria Source Sheet: www.sefaria.org/sheets/442342

Listen to last year’s Lech Lecha Madlik Podcast: Abraham’s Epic Journey and Our Own

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized